Detection of gall stones after acute pancreatitis.

A J Goodman, J P Neoptolemos, D L Carr-Locke, D B Finlay, D P Fossard

Four methods of gall stone diagnosis after an attack of acute pancreatitis are analysed. Of 128 consecutive patients with acute pancreatitis, 99 patients were discharged from hospital without a definite aetiology. These patients had biochemical tests performed on admission and ultrasonography and oral cholecystography performed six weeks later. The sensitivity for ultrasonography was 87% and the specificity was 93%; the respective figures for oral cholecystography were 83% and 90%. The predictive value of positive ultrasonography was 100% and of negative ultrasonography 75%; the respective values for oral cholecystography were 95% and 68%. A combination of ultrasonography and oral cholecystography failed to detect nine of 70 patients with gall stones (13%). Of 35 patients with normal ultrasonography and oral cholecystography, 33 patients had an endoscopic retrograde cholangiogram (ERCP) which showed gall stones in a further seven patients. All three methods failed to reveal gall stones in two patients, confirmed by laparotomy. The sensitivity of admission biochemical analysis was 73% and the specificity was 94%; the predictive value of a positive result was 97% and of a negative result was 57%. Biochemical analysis predicted gall stones in six of the seven patients shown by ERCP. Only 9% of patients were finally considered to be idiopathic. In conclusion ultrasonography is the investigation of choice and ERCP should be undertaken in all patients who have normal ultrasonography and/or oral cholecystography but have biochemical criteria indicative of gall stones.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Yu, W., Li, W., Wang, Z., Ye, X., Li, N., Li, J. (2007). Early percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and papillotomy treatment for severe gallstone associated acute pancreatitis. Postgrad. Med. J. 83: 187-191 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Folsch, U. R., Nitsche, R., Ludtke, R., Hilgers, R. A., Creutzfeldt, W., The German Study Group on Acute Biliary Pancreatit, (1997). Early ERCP and Papillotomy Compared with Conservative Treatment for Acute Biliary Pancreatitis. NEJM 336: 237-242 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Neoptolemos, J. P., London, N., Slater, N. D., Carr-Locke, D. L., Fossard, D. P., Moosa, A. R. (1986). A Prospective Study of ERCP and Endoscopic Sphincterotomy in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Gallstone Acute Pancreatitis: A Rational and Safe Approach to Management. Arch Surg 121: 697-702 [Abstract]