Functional esophageal disorders
R E Clousea, J E Richterb, R C Headingc, J Janssensd, J A Wilsone
a Chair,
Committee on Functional Esophageal Disorders, Multinational Working
Teams to Develop Diagnostic Criteria for Functional Gastrointestinal
Disorders (Rome II), Washington University,
St Louis, MO, USA, b Co-Chair,
Committee on Functional Esophageal Disorders, Multinational Working
Teams to Develop Diagnostic Criteria for Functional Gastrointestinal
Disorders (Rome II), The Cleveland Clinic,
Cleveland, Ohio USA, c University of Edinburgh,
Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, d University of Leuven,
Leuven, Belgium, e Freeman Hospital,
Department of Surgery,
Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
Correspondence to: Ray E Clouse, MD, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, North Campus, 216 South Kingshighway Boulevard, Suite 6330, St Louis, MO 63110-1092, USA. Email: rclouse{at}im.wustl.edu
The functional esophageal disorders include globus, rumination
syndrome, and symptoms that typify esophageal diseases (chest pain,
heartburn, and dysphagia). Factors responsible for symptom production
are poorly understood. The criteria for diagnosis rest not only on
compatible symptoms but also on exclusion of structural and metabolic
disorders that might mimic the functional disorders. Additionally, a
functional diagnosis is precluded by the presence of a pathology-based
motor disorder or pathological reflux, defined by evidence of reflux
esophagitis or abnormal acid exposure time during ambulatory esophageal
pH monitoring. Management is largely empirical, although efficacy of
psychopharmacological agents and psychological or behavioral approaches
has been established for serveral of the functional esophageal
disorders. As gastroesophageal reflux disease overlaps in presentation
with most of these disorders and because symptoms are at least
partially provoked by acid reflux events in many patients, antireflux
therapy also plays an important role both in diagnosis and management.
Further understanding of the fundamental mechanisms responsible for
symptoms is a priority for future research efforts, as is the
consideration of treatment outcome in a broader sense than reduction in
esophageal symptoms alone. Likewise, the value of inclusive rather than
restrictive diagnostic criteria that encompass other gastrointestinal
and non-gastrointestinal symptoms should be examined to improve the accuracy of symptom-based criteria and reduce the dependence on objective testing.
Keywords: globus; rumination; chest pain; esophageal motility disorders; esophageal spasm; gastroesophageal reflux disease; Rome II
© 1999 by Gut
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Bredenoord, A J, Weusten, B L A M, Smout, A J P M
(2005). Symptom association analysis in ambulatory gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring. Gut
54: 1810-1817
[Full Text] -
Chial, H. J., Camilleri, M., Williams, D. E., Litzinger, K., Perrault, J.
(2003). Rumination Syndrome in Children and Adolescents: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis. Pediatrics
111: 158-162
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
