Gut

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gotoda, T
Right arrow Articles by Kakizoe, T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gotoda, T
Right arrow Articles by Kakizoe, T
Gut 2000;46:14-19 ( January )

Article

Expression of CD44 variants and prognosis in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma T Gotodaa, Y Matsumuraa, H Kondoa, H Onoa, A Kanamotoa e, H Katob, H Watanabeb, Y Tachimorib, Y Nakanishic, T Kakizoed

a Department of Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, b Department of Surgical Oncology Division, c Department of Pathology Division, National Cancer Center Research Institute, d National Cancer Center Hospital, e Department of Surgery, Mitsui Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

Correspondence to: Dr Y Matsumura, Department of Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.

Accepted for publication 3 August 1999

BACKGROUND---The CD44 variant (CD44v) isoforms have been noted as markers for tumour metastasis and prognosis in several adenocarcinomas.
AIMS---To investigate whether CD44v, especially the CD44v2 (v2) isoform, may be a useful prognostic factor for patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, using a recently developed monoclonal antibody against a v2 epitope.
PATIENTS---233 patients (211 men and 22 women; mean age 61.9 years), with oesophageal squamous cell carcinomas curatively removed without additional treatment between 1987 and 1996 at the National Cancer Center Hospital, were analysed for CD44v expression.
METHODS---The expression of CD44v was evaluated immunohistochemically using monoclonal antibodies against epitopes of the standard and variant protein, in paraffin embedded oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma tissue from 233 patients who had undergone cervical, mediastinal, and abdominal lymphadenectomy (three field dissection) for oesophagectomy. The data were evaluated for any correlation with clinicopathological indices or prognosis.
RESULTS---Although total CD44 and CD44v6 (v6) were respectively observed in 99% and 97% of the cancer specimens, the expression of v2 was only 30%. Patients whose tumours were v2 positive had a significantly better prognosis than those whose tumours were v2 negative (p = 0.031). Furthermore, in patients without lymph node metastasis, v2 positivity alone was a significant independent factor of prognosis (relative risk of death associated with v2 negativity, 4.7; p = 0.037) in multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS---These results indicate that v2 is a useful marker for clinical prognosis in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Particularly in patients without lymph node metastasis, v2 status may thus have implications for the use of adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy in patients with oesophageal cancer at an early stage.


Keywords: CD44 variants; oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma; metastasis; prognosis; immunohistochemistry


© 2000 by Gut



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
K S Nair, R Naidoo, and R Chetty
Expression of cell adhesion molecules in oesophageal carcinoma and its prognostic value
J. Clin. Pathol., April 1, 2005; 58(4): 343 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Society of Gastroenterology