Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Gut 2003;52:1419-1423; doi:10.1136/gut.52.10.1419
Copyright © 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Society of Gastroenterology.

SMALL INTESTINE

Efficacy and tolerability of racecadotril in the treatment of cholera in adults: a double blind, randomised, controlled clinical trial

N H Alam1, H Ashraf1, W A Khan1, M M Karim1, G J Fuchs1,2

1 Clinical Sciences Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research (ICDDR,B): Centre for Health and Population Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
2 Clinical Sciences Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research (ICDDR,B): Centre for Health and Population Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh, and Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr N H Alam, Clinical Sciences Division, ICDDR,B, GPO Box 128, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh;
nhalam{at}icddrb.org mail-to:nhalam{at}icddrb.org

Background: The enkephalins, endogenous opiate substances, act as neurotransmitters along the entire digestive tract where they elicit intestinal antisecretory activity without affecting intestinal transit time or motility. Racecadotril, through inhibition of enkephalinase, reinforces the physiological activity of endogenous enkephalins and, therefore, shows intestinal antisecretory activity.

Aim: We conducted the study to determine the role of racecadotril as an adjunct to the standard treatment of cholera in adults.

Methods: The study was a double blind, randomised, placebo controlled clinical trial involving 110 adult male cholera patients who received either racecadotril or placebo in addition to standard cholera treatment. The major outcome measures (stool output, oral rehydration solution (ORS) intake, requirements for unscheduled intravenous fluid infusion, and duration of diarrhoea) were compared between the groups.

Results: Of 110 patients enrolled, 54 received racecadotril and 56 received placebo. Admission clinical characteristics were comparable between the groups. There was no significant difference in (mean (SD)) total stool output (racecadotril v placebo 315 (228) v 280 (156) g/kg), total ORS intake (390 (264) v 369 (240) ml/kg), or duration of diarrhoea (35 (15) v 32 (13) hours) between the groups. Clinical success, defined as resolution of diarrhoea within 72 hours of initiation of study intervention, was similar in both groups (racecadotril v placebo 96% v 89%). The number of patients receiving unscheduled intravenous infusions was not significantly different between the groups (racecadotril v placebo 22% v 14%). No drug related adverse effect was noted.

Conclusion: The study demonstrated that racecadotril therapy, although found to be safe, does not provide additional benefit in the treatment of severe cholera in adults.

Keywords: cholera; diarrhoea; racecadotril; Vibrio cholerae

Abbreviations: ORS, oral rehydration solution; cAMP, cyclic adenosine monophosphate; ITT, intention to treat


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Cardiology Jobs

Gastroenterology Jobs