HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Competing interests All Versions of this Article: gut.2006.092320v1 55/11/1586    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Turner, G B Articles by Ardill, J E S Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Turner, G B Articles by Ardill, J E S Topic Collections Relevant Article

Circulating markers of prognosis and response to treatment in patients with midgut carcinoid tumours

¹ Northern Ireland Neuroendocrine Tumour Group, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK
² Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK
³ Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Queen’s University of Belfast, Mulhouse Building, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr J E S Ardill
Regional Peptide Laboratory, Kelvin Building, Royal Victoria Hospital, Grosvenor Rd, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK; joy.ardill{at}bll.n-i.nhs.uk

Background and aims: Midgut carcinoid tumours are uncommon tumours with an unpredictable clinical behaviour and few useful prognostic markers. Somatostatin analogues are widely used in treatment but a survival advantage has not been proven. We analysed features associated with poor prognosis and assessed the clinical implications of the biochemical response to therapy.

Methods: Clinical and biochemical data were collected for patients with midgut carcinoid tumours attending a tertiary referral neuroendocrine clinic from 1978 to 2000. Using death as the end point, univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed to identify prognostic indicators. The significance of altering biomarkers with therapy was also studied by including repeated measurements of the most prognostic biochemical parameter in a time dependent covariate survival analysis.

Results: We identified 139 patients with sufficient data for our analyses. Factors associated with a poor outcome on univariate analysis included: plasma neurokinin A (NKA), urinary 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid output, age, and 5 liver metastases. Plasma NKA was the strongest and only independent predictor of outcome on multivariate analysis. Patients in whom NKA continued to rise despite somatostatin analogues had a significantly worse survival than those in whom NKA stabilised or fell (one year survival rate 40% v 87%). Time dependent covariate analysis concluded that survival was better predicted by the most recent plasma NKA value rather than by the initial value.

Conclusions: Plasma NKA is an accurate marker of prognosis for midgut carcinoid tumours. This is the first paper to support a survival advantage in patients in whom plasma NKA is altered by somatostatin analogues.

Abbreviations: NKA, neurokinin A; 5HIAA, 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid; SP, substance P

Keywords: neuroendocrine tumours; prognosis; carcinoid tumours; somatostatin; neurokinin A

Relevant Article

Digest

Robin Spiller and Alastair Watson
Gut 2006 55: 1529a. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. L Cunningham, E. T Janson, S. Agarwal, L. Grimelius, and M. Stridsberg Tachykinins in endocrine tumors and the carcinoid syndrome Eur. J. Endocrinol., September 1, 2008; 159(3): 275 - 282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]