Gut

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Published Online First: 14 September 2005. doi:10.1136/gut.2005.078626
Gut 2006;55:457-462
Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Society of Gastroenterology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
gut.2005.078626v1
55/4/457    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gatta, L
Right arrow Articles by Vaira, D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gatta, L
Right arrow Articles by Vaira, D

HELIOBACTER PYLORI

Accuracy of breath tests using low doses of 13C-urea to diagnose Helicobacter pylori infection: a randomised controlled trial

L Gatta1, C Ricci2, A Tampieri1, J Osborn3, F Perna1, V Bernabucci1, D Vaira1

1 Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, S Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
2 Department of Gastroenterology, Spedali Civili and University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
3 Department of Public Health Science, "La Sapienza University", Rome, Italy

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor D Vaira
Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, S Orsola Hospital, Nuove Patologie, Via Massarenti 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy; vairadin{at}med.unibo.it


ABSTRACT
Background: The 13C-urea breath test (UBT) for detecting Helicobacter pylori infection is a non-invasive method based on the organism’s urease activity. Since its first description, the method has been extensively modified. However, only the dose of 13C-urea and the measurement equipment are directly related to the cost of the test.

Aims: (1) To assess the diagnostic accuracy before eradication therapy of three UBTs using 25, 15, and 10 mg of 13C-urea, respectively; and (2) to determine diagnostic performance in the post-eradication setting showing the highest values for sensitivity and specificity with the lowest dose of 13C-urea.

Methods: Three hundred consecutive patients were randomised to be tested with one of the three UBTs. All patients underwent upper endoscopy with biopsies. A total of 222 more patients were enrolled to evaluate the second aim. Infected patients were offered treatment and asked to return 4–6 weeks after the end of therapy to perform endoscopic follow up and to carry out 13C-UBT.

Results: In the pretreatment setting, 13C-UBT 25 mg had a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval (CI) 91.8–100) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI 93.7–100); 13C-UBT 15 mg had a sensitivity of 96.1% (95% CI 86.8–98.9) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI 92.6–100); and 13C-UBT 10 mg had a sensitivity of 89.1% (95% CI 77–95.3) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI 93.3–100). As the test with the best performance and the lowest dose of 13C-urea was 13C-UBT 15 mg, it was evaluated after treatment, reporting a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 79.6–100) and a specificity of 98.9% (95% CI 94.3–99.8).

Discussion: UBTs using 25 and 15 mg of 13C-urea were both accurate in the diagnosis of H pylori infection in untreated patients. 13C-UBT 15 mg was also accurate for follow up of patients after treatment.


Abbreviations: UBT, urea breath test; DOB, difference over baseline; STARD, standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy; LR+ve, LR–ve, likelihood ratio for a positive or negative test; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; BMI, body mass index; IQR, interquartile range

Keywords: 13C-urea breath test; Helicobacter pylori; dyspepsia; diagnosis







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Society of Gastroenterology