|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OESOPHAGUS |
1 Centre for Visceral Biomechanics and Pain, Department of Gastroenterology, Aalborg Hospital, Denmark, and Centre for Sensory-Motor Interaction (SMI), Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Denmark
2 Centre for Visceral Biomechanics and Pain, Department of Gastroenterology, Aalborg Hospital, Denmark
3 Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
4 Centre for Sensory-Motor Interaction (SMI), Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Denmark
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor A M Drewes
Centre for Visceral Biomechanics and Pain, Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Aalborg Hospital, DK-9100 Aalborg, Denmark; drewes{at}smi.auc.dk
Aim: To obtain a better understanding of nociceptive processing in patients with oesophagitis.
Patients and methods: Eleven patients with grade B oesophagitis were compared with an age and sex matched group of 16 healthy subjects. A probe was positioned in the lower part of the oesophagus. After preconditioning of the tissue, painful mechanical stimuli were applied as distensions with a bag using an impedance planimetric method. Distensions were done before and after pharmacological impairment of distension induced smooth muscle contractions. Thermal stimulation was performed by recirculating water at 1 and 60°C in the bag. The area under the temperature curve (AUC) represented caloric load. The referred pain area (being a proxy for the central pain mechanisms) to the mechanical stimuli was drawn at maximum pain intensities.
Results: Patients were hyposensitive to mechanical stimuli, as assessed by the distending volume (F = 8.1, p = 0.005). After relaxation of smooth muscle with butylscopolamine, the difference between the two groups was more evident (F = 27.4, p<0.001). AUC for cold stimulation was 1048.6 (242.7) °Cxs in controls and 889.8 (202.6) °Cxs in patients (p = 0.5). For heat stimuli, AUC values were 323.3 (104.1) and 81.3 (32.3) °Cxs in controls and patients, respectively (p = 0.04). The referred pain area to the mechanical stimulations was larger and more widespread in patients (49.3 (6.2) cm2 compared with controls 23.9 (7) cm2; p = 0.02).
Conclusions: The data indicate that peripheral sensitisation of heat sensitive receptors and pathways combined with facilitation of central pain mechanisms may explain the symptoms in patients with oesophagitis.
Abbreviations: AUC, area under the temperature curve; CNS, central nervous system; CSA, cross sectional area; GORD, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease; NERD, non-erosive reflux disease; PPI, proton pump inhibitors; VAS, visual analogue scale
Keywords: oesophagitis; experimental pain; acid; sensitisation
Relevant Article
Gut 2006 55: 905-908.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C H Knowles and Q Aziz Visceral hypersensitivity in non-erosive reflux disease Gut, May 1, 2008; 57(5): 674 - 683. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B Moshiree, Q Zhou, D D Price, and G N Verne Central sensitisation in visceral pain disorders Gut, July 1, 2006; 55(7): 905 - 908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |