Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 26 June 2007. doi:10.1136/gut.2007.123596
Gut 2007;56:1599-1605
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Society of Gastroenterology.

Pancreas and biliary tract

Endoscopic treatment of post-surgical bile duct injuries: long term outcome and predictors of success

Philip R de Reuver1, Erik A Rauws2, Mattijs Vermeulen1, Marcel G W Dijkgraaf3, Dirk J Gouma1, Marco J Bruno2

1 Departments of Surgery, Academic Medical Center – University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
2 Departments of Gastroenterology, Academic Medical Center – University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
3 Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Center – University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Marco Bruno, Department of Gastroenterology, Amsterdam Medical Centre, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands; m.j.bruno{at}amc.uva.nl

Objective: To analyse the short and long term outcome of endoscopic stent treatment after bile duct injury (BDI), and to determine the effect of multiple stent treatment.

Design, setting and patients: A retrospective cohort study was performed in a tertiary referral centre to analyse the outcome of endoscopic stenting in 67 patients with cystic duct leakage, 26 patients with common bile duct leakage and 110 patients with a bile duct stricture.

Main outcome measures: Long term outcome and independent predictors for successful stent treatment.

Results: Overall success in patients with cystic duct leakage was 97%. In patients with common bile duct leakage, stent related complications occurred in 3.8% (n = 1). The overall success rate was 89% (n = 23). In patients with a bile duct stricture, stent related complications occurred in 33% (n = 36) and the overall success rate was 74% (n = 81). After a mean follow up of 4.5 years, liver function tests did not identify "occult" bile duct strictures. Independent predictors for outcome were the number of stents inserted during the first procedure (OR 3.2 per stent; 95% CI 1.3 to 8.4), injuries classified as Bismuth III (OR 0.12; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.91) and IV (OR 0.04; CI 0.003 to 0.52) and endoscopic stenting before referral (OR 0.24; CI 0.06 to 0.88). Introduction of sequential insertion of multiple stents did not improve outcome (before 77% vs after 66%, p = 0.25), but more patients reported stent related pain (before 11% vs after 28%, p = 0.02).

Conclusions: In patients with a postoperative bile duct leakage and/or strictures, endoscopic stent treatment should be regarded as the choice of primary treatment because of safety and favourable long term outcome. Apart from the early insertion of more than one stent, the benefit from sequential insertion of multiple stents did not become readily apparent from this series.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Digest
Robin Spiller and Emad M El-Omar
Gut 2007 56: 1489. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Cardiology Jobs

Gastroenterology Jobs