Gut 2007;56:615-620
OESOPHAGUS
Prevalence of oesophageal eosinophils and eosinophilic oesophagitis in adults: the population-based Kalixanda study
1 Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Centre for Family and Community Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
2 Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, USA
3 Astra Zeneca R&D, Mölndal, Sweden
4 Institute of Pathology, Bayreuth, Germany
5 Department of Histopathology, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK
Correspondence to:
Dr Ronkainen (CeFAM
Karolinska Institutet) Ylipurrantie 17, SF-95410, Finland; jukka.ronkainen{at}fimnet.fi
Background: Eosinophilic oesophagitis may be increasing but the prevalence in the general population remains unknown. Our aim was to assess this and the presence of eosinophils in the distal oesophageal epithelium in the community.
Methods: Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed in a random sample (n = 1000) of the adult Swedish population (mean age 54 years, 49% men). Oesophageal biopsy samples were obtained from 2 cm above, and at, the Z-line. Any eosinophil infiltration of the epithelium was defined as "eosinophils present". Definite eosinophilic oesophagitis was defined as
20, probable as 1519, and possible as 514 eosinophils/high-power field (HPF, at magnification x40) in oesophageal biopsy specimens.
Results: Eosinophils were present in 48 subjects (4.8%, 95% CI 3.5 to 6.1%, mean age 54 years, 63% men), in 54% without troublesome reflux symptoms. Definite eosinophilic oesophagitis was present in four subjects (0.4%, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.8%, mean age 51 years, 75% men) and probable eosinophilic oesophagitis in seven subjects (0.7%, 95% CI 0.2 to 1.2%, mean age 58 years, 43% men). Erosive oesophagitis (OR = 2.99, 95% CI 1.58 to 5.66) and absence of dyspepsia (OR = 0.23, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.75) and Helicobacter pylori infection (OR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.92) were independent predictors for "eosinophils present". Definite eosinophilic oesophagitis was associated with dysphagia (2/66 vs 2/926, p = 0.025), and probable eosinophilic oesophagitis with narrowing of the oesophageal lumen (2/15 vs 5/978, p = 0.005).
Conclusions: Oesophageal eosinophils were present in nearly 5% of the general population; approximately 1% had definite or probable eosinophilic oesophagitis. Oesophageal eosinophils may be a manifestation of reflux disease in adults, but the condition is as likely to be asymptomatic and go unrecognised.
Abbreviations: ASQ, Abdominal Symptom Questionnaire; GORD, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease; HPF, high-power field
Keywords: eosinophilic oesophagitis; epidemiology; gastro-oesophageal reflux disease; population-based
Relevant Article
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Gut 2007 56: 601.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Attwood, S. E
(2009). Mechanisms underlying dysphagia in eosinophilic oesophagitis. Gut
58: 1041-1042
[Full Text] -
Yan, B M, Shaffer, E A
(2009). Primary eosinophilic disorders of the gastrointestinal tract. Gut
58: 721-732
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
(2007). EoE Prevalence in Asymptomatic Adults. JWatch Gastroenterology
2007: 2-2
[Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
