Gut

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

The most recent version of this article was published on 1 August 2008

Gut. Published Online First: 26 March 2008. doi:10.1136/gut.2007.144097
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Society of Gastroenterology

This Article
Free to AccessThis article has been Unlocked
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
gut.2007.144097v1
57/8/1083    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van den Broek, F. J C
Right arrow Articles by Dekker, E.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van den Broek, F. J C
Right arrow Articles by Dekker, E.
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Paper

Endoscopic tri-modal imaging for surveillance in ulcerative colitis: Randomized comparison of high resolution endoscopy and autofluorescence imaging for neoplasia detection; and evaluation of narrow band imaging for classification of lesions

Frank J C van den Broek 1, Paul Fockens 1, Susanne van Eeden 1, Johannes B Reitsma 1, James C H Hardwick 1, Pieter C F Stokkers 1 and Evelien Dekker 1*

1 Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Netherlands

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: e.dekker{at}amc.uva.nl.

Accepted 5 March 2008


*  Abstract

Background: Endoscopic tri-modal imaging (ETMI) incorporates white light endoscopy (WLE), autofluorescence imaging (AFI) and narrow band imaging (NBI).

Aims: To assess the value of ETMI for the detection and classification of neoplasia in patients with longstanding ulcerative colitis.

Design: Randomized comparative trial of tandem colonoscopies.

Setting: Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Patients and methods: Fifty patients with ulcerative colitis underwent surveillance colonoscopy with ETMI. Each colonic segment was inspected twice, once with AFI and once with WLE, in random order. All detected lesions were inspected by NBI for Kudo pit pattern analysis and additional random biopsies were taken.

Main outcome measures: Neoplasia miss-rates of AFI and WLE, and accuracy of the Kudo classification by NBI.

Results: Among patients assigned to inspection with AFI first (n=25), 10 neoplastic lesions were primarily detected. Subsequent WLE detected no additional neoplasia. Among patients examined with WLE first (n=25), 3 neoplastic lesions were detected; subsequent inspection with AFI added 3 neoplastic lesions. Neoplasia miss-rates for AFI and WLE were 0% and 50% (p=0.036). The Kudo classification by NBI had a sensitivity and specificity of 75% and 81%; however, all neoplasia was colored purple on AFI (sensitivity 100%). No additional patients with neoplasia were detected by random biopsies.

Conclusion: Autofluorescence imaging improves the detection of neoplasia in patients with UC and decreases the yield of random biopsies. Pit pattern analysis by NBI has a moderate accuracy for the prediction of histology, whereas AFI-color appears valuable in excluding the presence of neoplasia.



Related Article

Digest
Robin Spiller and Magnus Simren
Gut 2008 57: i. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Society of Gastroenterology