Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Gut 1999;45:480-481; doi:10.1136/gut.45.4.480
Copyright © 1999 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Society of Gastroenterology.
Gut 1999;45:480-481 ( October )

Commentary

See article on page 588

Screening for colorectal cancer: the heart of the matter

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

All screening interventions have the potential to do harm and screening by faecal occult blood testing (FOBT) is no exception. The harm arises not from the test itself, although the psychological impact is not negligible, but mainly from the investigation and treatment of test positives. The benefits of FOBT have been studied extensively and it seems that among those who comply with biennial testing, colorectal cancer mortality is significantly reduced1-3 and that the reduction is greater when the test is used annually.4 But there is a price to pay. Firstly, there is the anxiety engendered by performing the test itself and the greater anxiety induced in those who are found to be positive requiring further investigation. Although this has been shown to be short-lived, lasting mainly until the completion of diagnostic investigations, cumulatively it might be expected to affect around 10% of those complying with the test biennially over 20 . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

The risks of screening: data from the Nottingham randomised controlled trial of faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer
M H E Robinson, J D Hardcastle, S M Moss, S S Amar, J O Chamberlain, N C M Armitage, J H Scholefield, and C M Mangham
Gut 1999 45: 588-592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Ransohoff, D. F. (2009). How Much Does Colonoscopy Reduce Colon Cancer Mortality?. ANN INTERN MED 150: 50-52 [Full Text]  
  • Kelloff, G. J., Schilsky, R. L., Alberts, D. S., Day, R. W., Guyton, K. Z., Pearce, H. L., Peck, J. C., Phillips, R., Sigman, C. C. (2004). Colorectal Adenomas: A Prototype for the Use of Surrogate End Points in the Development of Cancer Prevention Drugs. Clin. Cancer Res. 10: 3908-3918 [Full Text]  
  • Taylor, S. A., Halligan, S., O'Donnell, C., Morley, S., Mistry, H., Saunders, B. P., Vance, M., Bassett, P., Windsor, A., Stern, Y., Bethel, H., Atkin, W., Bartram, C. I. (2003). Cardiovascular Effects at Multi-Detector Row CT Colonography Compared with Those at Conventional Endoscopy of the Colon. Radiology 229: 782-790 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Anderson, W. F., Guyton, K. Z., Hiatt, R. A., Vernon, S. W., Levin, B., Hawk, E. (2002). Colorectal Cancer Screening for Persons at Average Risk. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 94: 1126-1133 [Full Text]  
  • Scholefield, J H, Moss, S, Sufi, F, Mangham, C M, Hardcastle, J D (2002). Effect of faecal occult blood screening on mortality from colorectal cancer: results from a randomised controlled trial. Gut 50: 840-844 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Koduri, P. (2001). Screening for colorectal cancer. CMAJ 164: 967-967 [Full Text]  
  • Winawer, S. J., Zauber, A. G. (2001). Screening for colorectal cancer. CMAJ 164: 967-968 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Cardiology Jobs

Gastroenterology Jobs