Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Gut 2003;52:10-11; doi:10.1136/gut.52.1.10
Copyright © 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Society of Gastroenterology.
Gut 2003;52:10-11
© 2003 by Gut

CLINICAL @LERT

Dyspepsia management in the millennium: to test and treat or not?

B C Delaney

Primary Care Clinical Sciences Building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; b.c.delaney@bham.ac.uk


Test and treat followed by endoscopy for non-responders was less cost effective than empiric proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment followed by endoscopy or with strategies of test and treat followed by empiric PPI (or vice versa).

Keywords: Helicobacter pylori; decision analysis; dyspepsia; proton pump inhibitors

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Decision analysis can be used to bridge the gap between evidence and practice. It may be used to highlight the best choice between competing management strategies where no direct trial evidence is available or add additional information, for example cost data, to extrapolate from available trial evidence.1 The use of sensitivity analysis, changing the parameters such as the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori, is particularly helpful in establishing an "envelope" within which a particular strategy is cost effective. Trials, meta-analyses, and modelling can be seen as working together to create a practical quantified evidence base.


Spiegel BMR, Vakil NB, Ofman JJ. Dyspepsia management in primary care—a decision analysis of competing strategies. Gastroenterology 2002;122:1270–85. [CrossRef][Medline]

Background: Several consensus statements have recommended Helicobacter pylori testing and eradication (test and treat) followed by endoscopy for non-responders for the management of simple uninvestigated dyspepsia, particularly in patients aged <45 years. However, . . . [Full text of this article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Digest
Ian Forgacs
Gut 2003 52: 1. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Kuptsova, N., Kopecky, K. J., Godwin, J., Anderson, J., Hoque, A., Willman, C. L., Slovak, M. L., Ambrosone, C. B. (2007). Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and therapeutic outcomes of AML patients from SWOG clinical trials. Blood 109: 3936-3944 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Corrigan, O P (2005). Pharmacogenetics, ethical issues: review of the Nuffield Council on Bioethics Report. J. Med. Ethics 31: 144-148 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Mohrenweiser, H. W. (2004). Genetic Variation and Exposure Related Risk Estimation: Will Toxicology Enter a New Era? DNA Repair and Cancer as a Paradigm. Toxicol Pathol 32: 136-145 [Abstract]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Cardiology Jobs

Gastroenterology Jobs