EDITORIAL
How Gut handles your manuscript
Editor
Keywords: editorial; review; publication
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The editorial team in Gut are determined, on behalf of their readers, to attract the very best original research, the results of which will influence clinical practice in the immediate and medium term. With this in mind, we have embarked on a series of changes designed to encourage authors to consider Gut as the best vehicle for disseminating their original ideas.
Three years ago we converted to an all electronic submission process which has markedly speeded up the submission and review process. One unintended result has been to also increase the number of submissions substantially, meaning that the proportion of acceptances has fallen to around 1 in 6. Regrettably, many authors must be disappointed. However, on the plus side, this means we have some excellent manuscripts to consider.
Once manuscripts are uploaded, they are all seen by the Editor after submission on a daily basis and, providing they seem suitable,
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
Services
- Email this link to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Add article to my folders
- Download to citation manager
- Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
