|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
LETTER |
1 School of Surgery and Pathology, University of Western Australia, Western Australia, Australia
2 Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr B Iacopetta
School of Surgery and Pathology M507, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Nedlands 6009, Australia; barry.iacopetta@uwa.edu.au
Keywords: 5-fluorouracil; colorectal cancer; microsatellite instability; adjuvant chemotherapy
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
We read with interest the study by Jover and colleagues (Gut 2006;55:84855) on the predictive value of the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) or microsatellite instability (MSI) phenotype for response of colorectal cancer patients to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy. We are concerned however about the conclusion reached by the authors and the accompanying commentary (Gut 2006;55:75961) that MSI status should be considered in decisions on the use of 5-FU. While the clinical utility of MSI status for screening of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is unquestioned, we are of the opinion that currently available data cannot justify exclusion of patients with MSI tumours from receiving 5-FU treatment.
The authors state that "5-FU based chemotherapy may not be useful in stage II and III MMR deficient colorectal cancer and a revision in the management of this subgroup should be considered". However, examination of the results
Related Articles
Gut 2006 55: 1819.
Gut 2006 55: 759-761.
Gut 2006 55: 848-855.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Imai and H. Yamamoto Carcinogenesis and microsatellite instability: the interrelationship between genetics and epigenetics Carcinogenesis, April 1, 2008; 29(4): 673 - 680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |