Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 December 2005

Gut. Published Online First: 14 July 2005. doi:10.1136/gut.2005.069427
Copyright © 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Society of Gastroenterology.

Paper

Diagnosis of small bowel Crohn's disease: a prospective comparison of capsule endoscopy with magnetic resonance imaging and fluoroscopic enteroclysis

Jörg G. Albert 1, Friederike Martiny 1, Annette Krummenerl 1, Karsten Stock 2, Joachim Le{beta}ke 1, Christa M. Göbel 1, Erich Lotterer 1, Hubert H Nietsch 1, Curt Behrmann 2 and Wolfgang E. Fleig 1*

1 First Department of Medicine, Martin-Luther-University Hospitals and Clinics, Germany
2 Department of Radiology, Martin-Luther-University Hospitals and Clinics, Germany

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: wolfgang.fleig{at}medizin.uni-halle.de.

Accepted 27 June 2005


Abstract

Background & Aims: The diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy (CE) as compared to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in small bowel Crohn's disease is not well- established. We prospectively investigated CE, MRI, and double-contrast fluoroscopy in patients with suspected small bowel Crohn's disease.

Methods: 52 consecutive patients (39 female, 13 male) were investigated by MRI, fluoroscopy and - if bowel obstruction could be excluded - by CE. In 25, Crohn's disease was newly suspected, while the diagnosis of Crohn's disease (non small bowel) had been previously established in 27.

Results: Small bowel Crohn's disease was diagnosed in 41 out of 52 patients (79%). CE was not accomplished in 14 patients due to bowel strictures. Of the remaining 27 patients, CE, MRI, and fluoroscopy detected small bowel Crohn's disease in 25 (93%), 21 (78%), and 7 (of 21; 33%) cases, respectively. CE was the only diagnostic tool in four patients. CE was slightly more sensitive than MRI (12 vs. 10 of 13 in suspected Crohn's disease and 13 vs. 11 of 14 in established Crohn's disease). MRI detected inflammatory conglomerates and enteric fistulae in 3 and 2 cases, respectively.

Conclusion: CE and MRI are complementary means in diagnosing small bowel Crohn's disease. CE is capable of detecting limited mucosal lesions that may be missed by MRI, but awareness of bowel obstruction is mandatory. In contrast, MRI is helpful to identify transmural Crohn's disease and extra-luminal lesions, and may exclude strictures.

Keywords: Crohn's disease, capsule endoscopy, digestive system endoscopy, inflammatory bowel disease, small bowel endoscopy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

White cell scanning has a role in imaging small and large bowel
A P Poullis
Gut 2006 55: 903. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Digest
Robin Spiller
Gut 2005 54: 1667. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Fidler, J. L., Guimaraes, L., Einstein, D. M. (2009). MR Imaging of the Small Bowel. RadioGraphics 29: 1811-1825 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Leyendecker, J. R., Bloomfeld, R. S., DiSantis, D. J., Waters, G. S., Mott, R., Bechtold, R. E. (2009). MR Enterography in the Management of Patients with Crohn Disease. RadioGraphics 29: 1827-1846 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sinha, R., Rajiah, P., Murphy, P., Hawker, P., Sanders, S. (2009). Utility of High-Resolution MR Imaging in Demonstrating Transmural Pathologic Changes in Crohn Disease. RadioGraphics 29: 1847-1867 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Rimola, J, Rodriguez, S, Garcia-Bosch, O, Ordas, I, Ayala, E, Aceituno, M, Pellise, M, Ayuso, C, Ricart, E, Donoso, L, Panes, J (2009). Magnetic resonance for assessment of disease activity and severity in ileocolonic Crohn's disease. Gut 58: 1113-1120 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lee, S. S., Kim, A. Y., Yang, S.-K., Chung, J.-W., Kim, S. Y., Park, S. H., Ha, H. K. (2009). Crohn Disease of the Small Bowel: Comparison of CT Enterography, MR Enterography, and Small-Bowel Follow-Through as Diagnostic Techniques. Radiology 251: 751-761 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Masselli, G., Polettini, E., Casciani, E., Bertini, L., Vecchioli, A., Gualdi, G. (2009). Small-Bowel Neoplasms: Prospective Evaluation of MR Enteroclysis. Radiology 251: 743-750 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Rimola, J., Rodriguez, S., Garcia-Bosch, O., Ricart, E., Pages, M., Pellise, M., Ayuso, C., Panes, J. (2009). Role of 3.0-T MR Colonography in the Evaluation of Inflammatory Bowel Disease1. RadioGraphics 29: 701-719 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sidhu, R, Sanders, D S, Morris, A J, McAlindon, M E (2008). Guidelines on small bowel enteroscopy and capsule endoscopy in adults. Gut 57: 125-136 [Full Text]  
  • Maglinte, D. D. T., Sandrasegaran, K., Chiorean, M., Dewitt, J., McHenry, L., Lappas, J. C. (2007). Radiologic Investigations Complement and Add Diagnostic Information to Capsule Endoscopy of Small-Bowel Diseases. Am. J. Roentgenol. 189: 306-312 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cao, X C, Wang, B M, Han, Z C (2006). Wireless capsule endoscopic finding in Cronkhite-Canada syndrome.. Gut 55: 899-900 [Full Text]  

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

White cell scanning has a role in imaging small and large bowel
Andrew P Poullis
Gut Online, 13 Dec 2005 [Full text]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Cardiology Jobs

Gastroenterology Jobs