Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 March 2007

Gut. Published Online First: 27 September 2006. doi:10.1136/gut.2006.099614
Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Society of Gastroenterology.

Paper

A prospective comparative study of narrow-band imaging, chromoendoscopy, and conventional colonoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia

Han-Mo Chiu 1, Chi-Yang Chang 2, Chien-Chuan Chen 1, Yi-Chia Lee 1, Ming-Shiang Wu 1, Jaw-Town Lin 1, Chia-Tung Shun 1 and Hsiu-Po Wang 1*

1 National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan
2 E-Da Hospital, I-Shou University, Taiwan

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: whp{at}ha.mc.ntu.edu.tw.

Accepted 5 September 2006


Abstract

Background: Discrimination between neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions is crucial in colorectal cancer screening. Application of narrow-band imaging (NBI) in colonoscopy visualizes mucosal vascular networks in neoplastic lesions and may improve diagnostic accuracy.

Aim: To compare the diagnostic efficacy of NBI in differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal lesions with diagnostic efficacies of standard modalities, conventional colonoscopy, and chromoendoscopy.

Methods: In this prospective study, 180 colorectal lesions (in 133 patients) were observed with conventional colonoscopy, and, under low- and high-magnification NBI and chromoendoscopy. Lesions were resected for histopathological analysis. Endoscopic images were stored electronically and randomly allocated to two readers for evaluation. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of each endoscopic modality was assessed by reference to histopathology.

Results: NBI and chromoendoscopy scored better under high than under low magnification in comparison with conventional colonoscopy. The diagnostic accuracy of NBI with low or high magnification was significantly higher than that of conventional colonoscopy (low magnification: p=0.0434 for reader 1 and p=0.004 for reader 2; high magnification: p<0.0001 for both readers) and was comparable to that of chromoendoscopy.

Conclusion: Both low- and high-magnification NBI were capable of distinguishing neoplastic from non- neoplastic colorectal lesions and the diagnostic accuracy of NBI was better than that of conventional colonoscopy and equivalent to that of chromoendoscopy. The role of NBI in screening colonoscopy needs further evaluation.

Keywords: chromoendoscopy, colorectal neoplasia, magnifying colonoscopy, narrow-band imaging (NBI), sensitivity and specificity


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Digest
Emad El-Omar
Gut 2007 56: 313. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Matsuda, T., Fujii, T., Sano, Y., Kudo, S.-e., Oda, Y., Igarashi, M., Iishi, H., Murakami, Y., Ishikawa, H., Shimoda, T., Kaneko, K., Yoshida, S. (2009). Five-year Incidence of Advanced Neoplasia after Initial Colonoscopy in Japan: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study. Jpn J Clin Oncol 39: 435-442 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pohl, J, Lotterer, E, Balzer, C, Sackmann, M, Schmidt, K-D, Gossner, L, Schaab, C, Frieling, T, Medve, M, Mayer, G, Nguyen-Tat, M, Ell, C (2009). Computed virtual chromoendoscopy versus standard colonoscopy with targeted indigocarmine chromoscopy: a randomised multicentre trial. Gut 58: 73-78 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Adler, A, Pohl, H, Papanikolaou, I S, Abou-Rebyeh, H, Schachschal, G, Veltzke-Schlieker, W, Khalifa, A C, Setka, E, Koch, M, Wiedenmann, B, Rosch, T (2008). A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect?. Gut 57: 59-64 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • East, J. E, Guenther, T., Kennedy, R. H, Saunders, B. P (2007). Narrow band imaging avoids potential chromoendoscopy risks. Gut 56: 1168-1169 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Cardiology Jobs

Gastroenterology Jobs