Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 October 2007

Gut. Published Online First: 19 February 2007. doi:10.1136/gut.2007.119651
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Society of Gastroenterology.

Paper

Evaluation of a card collection based faecal immunochemical test in screening for colorectal cancer using a two-tier reflex approach

Callum G Fraser 1*, Catriona M Matthew 1, N Ashley G Mowat 2, John A Wilson 3, Francis A Carey 1 and Robert JC Steele 4

1 NHS Tayside, United Kingdom
2 NHS Grampian, United Kingdom
3 NHS Fife, United Kingdom
4 University of Dundee, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: callum.fraser{at}tuht.scot.nhs.uk.

Accepted 15 February 2007


Abstract

Background The guaiac fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) has been proven as a screening investigation for colorectal cancer but has disadvantages. Newer faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) have many advantages but yield higher positivity rates and are expensive. A two-tier reflex follow-up of gFOBT positive individuals with a FIT prior to colonoscopy has been advocated as an efficient and effective approach.

Methods A new very simple and stable card collection FIT has been evaluated.

Results 1124 individuals who were gFOBT positive were asked to provide samples. 558 individuals participated, 320 refused and 246 did not return samples. There was no evidence of sampling bias. 302 tested FIT negative and 256 tested positive. In the 302 negative, 2 (0.7%) had cancer and 12 (4.0%) had large or multiple (high risk) adenomatous polyps. In contrast, of 254 positive, 47 (18.5%) had cancer and 54 (21.3%) had high risk polyps. 93 (30.8%) of the negative had a normal colonoscopy but only 34 (13.4%) of the positive had no pathology. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios (and 95% CI) for cancer were 95.9% (84.8-99.3), 59.2% (54.7-63.5), 2.35 (2.08-2.65) and 0.07 (0.02-0.27) and for cancer plus high risk polyps were 87.8% (80.1-92.9), 65.3% (60.6-69.7), 2.53 (2.19-2.93) and 0.19 (0.11-0.31).

Conclusions A two-tier reflex screening algorithm, in which gFOBT positive participants are tested with a FIT, is effective in identifying individuals at high risk of significant colorectal neoplasia. This strategy is transferable across different FIT formats. This approach has been adopted for the Scottish Bowel Screening Programme.

Keywords: colorectal cancer, faecal immunochemical test, faecal occult blood test, screening, two-tier approach


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

What is the role of iFOBT in screening for colorectal cancer?
David F Ransohoff
Gut 2007 56: 1343-1344. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Steele, R J C, McClements, P L, Libby, G, Black, R, Morton, C, Birrell, J, Mowat, N A G, Wilson, J A, Kenicer, M, Carey, F A, Fraser, C G (2009). Results from the first three rounds of the Scottish demonstration pilot of FOBT screening for colorectal cancer. Gut 58: 530-535 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Brown, L. F, Fraser, C. G (2008). Effect of delay in sampling on haemoglobin determined by faecal immunochemical tests. Ann Clin Biochem 45: 604-605 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Fraser, C G, Mathew, C M, McKay, K, Carey, F A, Steele, R J C (2008). Automated immunochemical quantitation of haemoglobin in faeces collected on cards for screening for colorectal cancer. Gut 57: 1256-1260 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Fraser, C. G (2008). Faecal occult blood tests - eliminate, enhance or update?. Ann Clin Biochem 45: 117-121 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ransohoff, D. F (2007). What is the role of iFOBT in screening for colorectal cancer?. Gut 56: 1343-1344 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Cardiology Jobs

Gastroenterology Jobs