Gut. Published Online First: 4 February 2008. doi:10.1136/gut.2007.141481
Paper |
Secreted enteric antimicrobial activity localizes to the mucus surface layer
1 Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
2 University of Freiburg, Germany
3 Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control, Sweden
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mats.andersson.2{at}ki.se.
Accepted 16 January 2008
Abstract
Objectives: The intestinal mucosa is constantly exposed to a dense and highly dynamic microbial flora and challenged by a variety of enteropathogenic bacteria. Antibacterial protection is provided, in part by Paneth cell-derived antibacterial peptides such as the a-defensins. The mechanism of peptide-mediated antibacterial control and its functional importance for gut homeostasis has recently been appreciated in patients with Crohn's ileitis. In the present study we analysed the spatial distribution of antimicrobial peptides within the small intestinal anatomical compartments such as the intestinal crypts, the overlaying mucus and the luminal content.
Methods: Preparations from the different intestinal locations as well as whole mouse small intestine were extracted and separated by reversed phase-HPLC. Antibacterial activity was determined in extracts, and the presence of antimicrobial peptides/proteins was confirmed by N-terminal sequencing, mass spectrometry analysis and immunodetection.
Results: The secreted antibacterial activity was largely confined to the mucus layer, whereas only minute activity was noted in the luminal content. The extractable activity originating from either crypt / mucus / lumen compartments respectively (given as percentage) was for L. monocytogenes, 48±4 / 44±4 / 8±8; E. faecalis, 44±10 / 49±3 / 7±7; B. megaterium, 56±4 / 42±3 / 2±1; S. pyogenes, 48±4 / 46±3 / 6±6; E. coli, 46±4 / 47±3 / 7±7 and S. typhimurium, 38±3 / 43±7 / 19±10. A spectrum of antimicrobial peptides was identified in isolated mucus, which exhibited strong and contact-dependent antibacterial activity against both commensal as well as pathogenic bacteria.
Conclusion: These findings show that secreted antimicrobial peptides are retained by the surface-overlaying mucus and thereby provide a combined physical and antibacterial barrier to prevent bacterial attachment and invasion. This distribution facilitates high local peptide concentration on vulnerable mucosal surfaces, while still allowing the presence of an enteric microbiota.
Keywords: MALDI-TOF, defensin, innate, mucus, small intestine
Relevant Article
- Digest
- Robin Spiller and Magnus Simren
Gut 2008 57: 1-2.[Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Glenn, G. M., Francis, D. H., Danielsen, E. M.
(2009). Toxin-Mediated Effects on the Innate Mucosal Defenses: Implications for Enteric Vaccines. Infect. Immun.
77: 5206-5215
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Vaishnava, S., Behrendt, C. L., Ismail, A. S., Eckmann, L., Hooper, L. V.
(2008). Paneth cells directly sense gut commensals and maintain homeostasis at the intestinal host-microbial interface. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
105: 20858-20863
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
