Article Text

PDF

Double-blind comparison of cimetidine and placebo in the maintenance of healing of chronic duodenal ulceration.
  1. K D Bardhan,
  2. D M Saul,
  3. J L Edwards,
  4. P M Smith,
  5. S J Haggie,
  6. J H Wyllie,
  7. H L Duthie,
  8. I V Fussey

    Abstract

    Patients suffering from chronic duodenal ulceration were allocated at random to treatment with either cimetidine (400 mg twice daily) or matching placebo for six months. Before entry to the trial all patients were shown to have healed ulcers on endoscopy. Most of the patients had participated in a one-month trial of cimetidine during which their ulcers healed. The trial showed that four of 29 patients relapsed on maintenance treatment with cimetidine, which therefore did not confer complete immunity from relapse. However, cimetidine treatment was very much better than placebo treatment, on which 18 of 31 patients relapsed. Of the 22 patients who relapsed clinically, 20 were submitted to endoscopy and 19 of these were shown to have ulcerated again. Endoscopy at the end of the trial showed that ulcers had also redeveloped in five of 28 asymptomatic patients. Length of previous dyspeptic history had no bearing on the results of the trial but there was evidence that relapse on placebo was less likely if the ulcer had originally healed on a high dose of cimetidine. Clinical relapse was associated with worsening duodenitis. Symptoms, clinical observation, and laboratory tests showed no important abnormalities in the patients.

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.