rss
Gut 1998;42:517-521 doi:10.1136/gut.42.4.517
  • Motility and visceral sensation

Biofeedback provides long term benefit for patients with intractable, slow and normal transit constipation

  1. E Chiotakakou-Faliakou,
  2. M A Kamm,
  3. A J Roy,
  4. J B Storrie,
  5. I C Turner
  1. St Mark’s Hospital, London, UK
  1. Dr M A Kamm, St Mark’s Hospital, Northwick Park, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex HA1 3UJ, UK.
  • Accepted 9 October 1997

Abstract

Background—Many patients with idiopathic constipation do not respond to conventional medical treatments. Recently biofeedback has been proposed as an alternative treatment but the long term results, and which patients benefit, are unknown. Treatment has usually been restricted to patients with normal colonic transit and impaired pelvic floor coordination on straining.

Aims—To determine the efficacy and long term outcome of biofeedback treatment in idiopathic constipation.

Methods—One hundred consecutive contactable patients who had completed a course of biofeedback more than 12 months previously were identified. Pretreatment details of bowel function and symptoms, whole gut transit time, and anorectal physiological testing, which had been previously prospectively collected, were collated. Follow up consisted of structured interview. Sixty five per cent had slow transit and 59% had paradoxical pelvic floor contraction on straining.

Results—Median follow up was 23 months (range 12–44). On long term follow up 55% felt that biofeedback had helped and 57% felt their constipation was improved. There was a significant reduction in need to strain, abdominal pain, bloating, and oral laxative use. Spontaneous bowel frequency was significantly improved by treatment. Patients with slow and normal transit, males and females, and those with and without paradoxical contraction of the anal sphincter on straining, benefited equally from treatment. Anorectal testing did not predict outcome.

Conclusion—This study suggests that biofeedback is an effective long term treatment for the majority of patients with idiopathic constipation unresponsive to traditional treatments. Pelvic floor abnormalities and transit time should not form selection criteria for treatment.

Footnotes

    This Article

    Services

    1. Request permissions

    Social bookmarking

    Latest from Gut Education

    Latest from Gut Education

    Register for free content


    Free sample
    This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of Gut.
    View free sample issue >>

    Free archive
    The full back archive is now available for Gut. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
    Register to access the free archive >>

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.