Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Use of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with a reference imaging method
  1. S H Zidia,
  2. F Prata,
  3. O Le Guenb,
  4. Y Rondeaub,
  5. L Rocherb,
  6. J Fritscha,
  7. A D Chourya,
  8. G Pelletiera
  1. aDepartment of Hepatogastroenterology, Bicêtre Hospital, 94 275 Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France, bDepartment of Radiology, Bicêtre Hospital, Bicêtre, France
  1. Dr F Prat, Service des Maladies du Foie et de l’Appareil Digestif, 78 rue du Général Leclerc, Bicêtre Hospital, 94 275 Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France.

Abstract

Background Magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) is a new technique for non-invasive imaging of the biliary tract.

Aim To assess the results of MRC in patients with suspected bile duct stones as compared with those obtained with reference imaging methods.

Patients/Methods 70 patients (34 men and 36 women, mean (SD) age 71 (15.5) years; median 75) with suspected bile duct stones were included (cholangitis, 33; pancreatitis, three; suspected post-cholecystectomy choledocholithiasis, nine; cholestasis, six; stones suspected on ultrasound or computed tomography scan, 19). MR cholangiograms with two dimensional turbo spin echo sequences were acquired. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with or without sphincterotomy (n = 63), endosonography (n = 5), or intraoperative cho- langiography (n = 2) were the reference imaging techniques used for the study and were performed within 12 hours of MRC. Radiologists were blinded to the results of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and previous investigations.

Results 49 patients (70%) had bile duct stones on reference imaging (common bile duct, 44, six of which impacted in the papilla; intrahepatic, four; cystic duct stump, one). Stone size ranged from 1 to 20 mm (mean 6.1, median 5.5). Twenty seven patients (55%) had bile duct stones smaller than 6 mm. MRC diagnostic accuracy for bile duct lithiasis was: sensitivity, 57.1%; specificity, 100%; positive predictive value, 100%; negative predictive value, 50%.

Conclusions Stones smaller than 6 mm are still often missed by MRC when standard equipment is used. The general introduction of new technical improvements is needed before this method can be considered reliable for the diagnosis of bile duct stones.

  • bile duct calculi
  • endoscopic retrograde cholangiography
  • magnetic resonance cholangiography
  • Abbreviations

    MRC
    magnetic resonance cholangiography
    ERC
    endoscopic retrograde cholangiography
    CBD
    common bile duct
    TSE
    turbo spin echo
    CT
    computed tomography
    MRI
    magnetic resonance imaging
  • Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

  • Abbreviations

    MRC
    magnetic resonance cholangiography
    ERC
    endoscopic retrograde cholangiography
    CBD
    common bile duct
    TSE
    turbo spin echo
    CT
    computed tomography
    MRI
    magnetic resonance imaging
  • View Full Text