Article Text

PDF

Toxic bile acids in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: influence of gastric acidity
  1. D Nehrab,
  2. P Howella,
  3. C P Williamsa,
  4. J K Pyea,
  5. J Beynonb
  1. aDepartments of General Surgery and Medical Biochemistry, Wrexham Maelor Hospital, Wrexham, UK, bSingleton Hospital, Swansea, UK
  1. Mr D Nehra, Department of Surgery C2, University Hospital Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XW, UK.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Bile acid toxicity has been shown in the gastric, colonic, and hepatic tissues; the effect on oesophageal mucosa is less well known.

AIMS To determine the spectrum of bile acids refluxing in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and its relation to oesophageal pH using a new technique of combined oesophageal aspiration and pH monitoring.

METHODS Ten asymptomatic subjects and 30 patients with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (minimal mucosal injury, erosive oesophagitis (grade 2 or 3 Savary-Miller), Barrett’s oesophagus/stricture; n=10 in each group) underwent 15 hour continuous oesophageal aspiration with simultaneous pH monitoring. Bile acid assay of the oesophageal samples was performed using modified high performance liquid chromatography.

RESULTS The peak bile acid concentration and DeMeester acid scores were significantly higher in the patients with oesophagitis (median bile acid concentration 124 μmol/l; acid score 20.2) and Barrett’s oesophagus/stricture (181 μmol/l; 43.3) than patients with minimal injury (14 μmol/l; 12.5) or controls (0 μmol/l; 11.1). The predominant bile acids detected were cholic, taurocholic, and glycocholic acids but there was a significantly greater proportion of secondary bile acids, deoxycholic and taurodeoxycholic acids, in patients with erosive oesophagitis and Barrett’s oesophagus/stricture. Although bile acid reflux episodes occurred at variable pH, a temporal relation existed between reflux of taurine conjugates and oesophageal acid exposure (r=0.58, p=0.009).

CONCLUSION Toxic secondary bile acid fractions have been detected in patients with extensive mucosal damage. Mixed reflux is more harmful than acid reflux alone with possible toxic synergism existing between the taurine conjugates and acid.

  • bile acids
  • reflux oesophagitis
  • Barrett’s oesophagus

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Bile acid toxicity has been extensively studied but there is a wide variation in the reporting of relative toxicity of the individual bile acid fractions. Much information is based on the toxic effects of bile acids on gastric mucosa,1-3 colonic mucosa,4 5 and hepatocytes,6 7 but little information is available on the toxicity to oesophageal mucosa in reflux disease. Reflux of bile acids in the oesophagus has been estimated indirectly by “alkaline” reflux episodes on pH monitoring8 9 or by measuring bilirubin using the Bilitec 2000 spectrophotometric probe,10-12 but these methods are unreliable in quantifying reflux. The concentrations of bile acids and their toxic effects are known to vary with pH depending on the degree of ionisation. Unconjugated bile acids and glycine conjugates whose pKa values are more than 4 and 6, respectively, precipitate in solutions with pH less than 4, whereas taurine conjugates are freely soluble even at pH 2.13 14Oesophageal perfusion studies in animal models have shown that unconjugated bile acids cause mucosal damage selectively in alkaline solutions whereas taurine conjugates are toxic in acidic conditions.15 16 We have shown, using a new device17 for sampling of oesophageal fluid, that there is an association between the degree of oesophageal mucosal injury and concentrations of bile acids refluxing in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.18 In this paper we report the results of bile acid assay of conjugated and unconjugated fractions and investigate the temporal relation between the individual bile acid concentration and oesophageal pH.

Patients and methods

PATIENTS

Ten asymptomatic volunteers (male:female ratio 4:1; median age 28.5 years, range 19–50) and 30 patients (male:female ratio 2:1; median age 58.5 years, range 27–79) with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (minimal mucosal injury, n=10; erosive oesophagitis, n=10; Barrett’s oesophagus/stricture, n=10) underwent oesophageal aspiration studies with pH monitoring. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee at the Wrexham Maelor Hospital, Wrexham, UK.

PROCEDURE

The study was performed as an inpatient procedure over 15 hours between 1800 and 0900. All medication was stopped one week prior to the test. The patients were sitting or reclined during the early period of the study (four hours) and supine at night. The study was commenced four hours after a main meal and included a period of one to two hours to allow the effects of intubation to subside; during the procedure the subjects were restricted to fluids.

A combined 14F double channel sump tube (Zinetics Medical, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA) incorporating an antimony pH detector was passed nasally and the tip positioned to lie 5 cm above the manometrically located lower oesophageal sphincter. This tube was attached to the suction channel of the purpose built automated suction device. The main component of this device was a 24 volt peristaltic pump (No. 900–0624, Cole-Parmer, USA) connected to a Scorpion K40 microprocessor. A system of fibreoptic liquid detectors and pressure transducers was incorporated in the suction channel to monitor the flow and delivery of the aspirates into a standard biochemical sample receiver. The detailed design and functional aspects of this device have been described previously.17 Peripheral control through software programming allowed a different set of aspiration protocols to be used in the oesophageal sampling process. An autoregulated suction pressure (maximum 150 mm Hg) was applied and the oesophageal aspirates were collected as individual samples in autoanalyser cups (capacity 1.6 ml) resting on a rotating carousel. The onset of each sample retrieval and duration of collection was logged in the memory of the device. The samples were stored at −20°C and later assayed for bile acids using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).

A solid state pH logger (Oakfield Instruments, Oxon, UK) was used to monitor oesophageal pH simultaneously. The pH was measured every six seconds and stored in the pH logger. These data were downloaded to a personal computer as a file and matched with the data of sample retrieval.

MODIFIED HPLC METHOD OF BILE ACID ASSAY

Figure 1 presents a flow diagram of the procedure. The HPLC equipment used was a Kontron 420 solvent delivery system (Kontron Instrument, Watford, UK) with an HP Vectra 5 microprocessor controller running the Kontron control software. The HPLC method of bile acid assay was modified using a postcolumn derivation step; the bile acids themselves were separated by the chromatography but the individual bile acids were then reacted with the enzyme 3-α hydroxy steroid dehydrogenase using NAD (nicotamide adenine dinucleotide) as cofactor. The end product of this postcolumn reaction was the fluorescent species NADH (nicotamide adenine dinucleotide, reduced form) and the bile acids were quantified using a Jasco 821-FP fluorescence spectrophotometric detector (Ciba Corning Diagnostics, Halstead, UK). This step improved the specificity and sensitivity of the technique allowing a clear resolution of 14 bile acid fractions with an elution time of 35 minutes per sample. The analytical column (stationary phase) of the HPLC was a single Spherisorb S5 ODS2 column (25 cm × 4.6 mm internal diameter; Waters Corporation, Milford, Massachusetts, USA) with a porous, spherical silica based packing. Oesophageal aspirates contaminated with particulate material were centrifuged at 4000 rpm (3400g) for five minutes. The bile acids from the oesophageal samples were extracted using C18 octadectyl endcapped clean up extraction tubes (Technicol, Stockport, UK) using methanol as the solvent. A 20 μl sample was injected into a high pressure mobile phase of the HPLC. The mobile phase was prepared by mixing methanol (9% vol/vol), phosphate buffer (90% vol/vol), and tetrahydrofuran (1% vol/vol) and pH adjusted to pH 3.5 with orthophosphoric acid. The mobile phase flow rate was 0.3 ml/min at 1500 psi and at an ambient temperature of 22–23°C. The specificity of the HPLC assay was validated for this study by exact overlap of the corresponding peaks of bile acids in oesophageal aspirates and bile acid standards, with consistent analytical recovery and linear response for retention times.

Figure 1

Flow diagram of the modified HPLC method of bile acid assay, combining an enzymatic postcolumn derivation step.

DATA ANALYSIS AND STATISTICS

Bile acid concentrations of the oesophageal samples were matched with the pH data to obtain combined bile acid and pH profiles for each patient. The overall differences in the peak bile acid concentrations between groups were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis and the Mann-Whitney U tests. The relation between bile acid and oesophageal pH was assessed by correlating the concentration of individual bile acids present in the patient’s refluxate with the corresponding oesophageal acid exposure (percentage of the total time the pH was less than 4) using Spearman’s correlation coefficients. The patients were further categorised according to their prevailing reflux pattern into acid refluxers (percentage of the total time pH<4 greater than 4.4%), bile refluxers (oesophageal bile acid exposure of concentrations greater than 100 μmol/l), and mixed refluxers (acid and bile acid).

Results

The pattern of reflux episodes observed on the individual patient bile acid and pH profiles showed that bile acids refluxed at variable pH, although in most instances bile acids refluxed concurrently with acid. Table 1 shows the results of the oesophageal bile acid assay, expressed as the medians (range) of the peak concentrations of individual bile acid fractions in each group. The total bile acid concentrations in the patient groups with erosive oesophagitis (median 124 μmol/l) and Barrett’s oesophagus/stricture (median 181 μmol/l) were significantly greater than in the group with minimal injury (median 14 μmol/l). Five patients in the Barrett’s oesophagus group had reflux episodes with bile acid concentrations in excess of 200 μmol/l. The control group (asymptomatic subjects) had negligible bile acid reflux. Oesophageal acid exposure time was greater with increasing grade of mucosal injury with significantly higher DeMeester acid scores in the oesophagitis and Barrett’s oesophagus/stricture groups.

Table 1

Results of bile acid assay (median peak bile acid concentration and range) and oesophageal pH profile (median and interquartile range)

The predominant bile acid fractions detected in the patient groups were the primary bile acids, cholic acid, taurocholic acid, and glycocholic acid. Although these primary bile acids were found in increasingly higher concentrations in patient groups with progressive oesophageal mucosal injury, only taurocholic acid was significantly increased in the Barrett’s oesophagus/stricture group compared with the minimal injury group. The dihydroxy and monohydroxy secondary bile acids appeared more frequently in the bile acid profiles of patients with severe oesophagitis.

Taurodeoxycholic acid was found in significantly higher concentrations in the refluxates of patients with erosive oesophagitis and Barrett’s oesophagus/stricture while lower but significant concentrations of taurolithocholic acid were detected in the latter group. Figure 2 shows the total concentration of conjugated and unconjugated bile acids in each of the studied groups. There was a significant preponderance of the unconjugated bile acids in the erosive and Barrett’s oesophagus groups. Other bile acids detected in low concentrations were taurodeoxycholic, glycochenodeoxycholic, and glycodeoxycholic acids.

Figure 2

Distribution of conjugated and unconjugated bile acids in each group. Interquartile range and medians are represented. *p<0.05 versus normal; †p<0.05 versus normal and minimal (Mann-Whitney U test).

Figure 3 shows the pattern of reflux represented by the prevalence of acid reflux, bile acid reflux, and mixed reflux in each group. All of the 10 patients in the Barrett’s oesophagus/stricture group were gross refluxers. The prevalence of mixed reflux in eight patients (80%) was the highest in this group; it occurred in four patients (40%) with erosive oesophagitis and only in one patient (10%) in the minimal injury group. Overall, six patients (20%) had significant bile reflux in the absence of increased oesophageal acid exposure. Although the control subjects denied having reflux symptoms, in two an increased oesophageal acid exposure was recorded.

Figure 3

Prevalence of the reflux pattern in each group categorised as acid refluxers, bile acid refluxers, and mixed bile acid and acid refluxers.

Table 2 shows the correlation between individual bile acid concentration and oesophageal acid exposure. There was no correlation between the total bile acid concentration and the oesophageal acid exposure but there was specifically a positive correlation between the concentration of taurine conjugated bile acids in the refluxate and percentage acid exposure (r=0.58, p=0.009).

Table 2

Results of Spearman’s rank correlation analysis between the total/individual bile acid fractions with percentage of the total time pH<4

Discussion

Using prolonged oesophageal aspiration studies, followed by HPLC separation of bile acids, we have shown reflux of bile acids in concentrations greater than 200 μmol/l in 50% of the patients with severe oesophagitis and Barrett’s metaplasia. Bile acid concentrations in this range have been found to cause damage to the ultrastructure of the oesophageal epithelium in the presence of acidic pH.19A significant proportion of the bile acids in patients with extensive mucosal injury was composed of the dehydroxylated taurodeoxycholic acid and the unconjugated cholic and deoxycholic acids. The toxicity of bile acids, attributed to their complex solubility properties based on the individual pK a values and micelle formation, have been shown to be inversely proportional to the number of hydroxyl groups on the steroid nucleus.20 There has also been considerable interest in the effects of free bile acids (cholic, deoxycholic, and chenodeoxycholic acids), mainly because of the association of excessive bile acid deconjugation in the small intestine. These bile acids inhibit the main active transport systems for glucose, amino acids, and sodium in the jejunum21 22and cause extensive damage with loss of villi.23 Likewise the dihydroxy bile acids have been shown to depress notably a number of metabolic processes in the liver6 and the degree of hepatocellular damage is related to bile acid hydrophobicity.7 Recent data suggest that toxic bile acids are mitochondrial toxins.24

In this study the most common bile acids present in the refluxate were taurocholic, glycocholic, and cholic acids. A few studies have attempted to measure the bile acid fractions using oesophageal aspiration techniques and also found a predominance of the conjugated bile acids, taurocholic and glycocholic acids, in the oesophageal refluxate.25 26 These bile acids were significantly higher in the patients with oesophagitis and Barrett’s oesophagus’s but only in the postprandial period. The temporal association of bile acid reflux with oesophageal pH is unclear. Stoker and colleagues27 showed that there was a weakly positive correlation between bile salt concentration and increasing pH in samples of oesophageal fluid aspirated during routine endoscopy. None of the samples, however, had a pH of more than 6.9 (mean 4.0), suggesting that bile reflux occurred at an acidic or neutral pH. Prolonged oesophageal aspiration studies25 28 have shown that the episodes of acid reflux were recorded at all time periods during which conjugated bile acids were detected, but Steinet al,29 who performed ambulatory oesophageal aspiration, found a significant correlation between the bile acid concentrations in the aspirates and the percentage of time the pH was above 7; both were highest at night. These studies lack accuracy in their attempt to compare the temporal relation between bile acid reflux and oesophageal pH, mainly because they involve analysis of pooled aspirates. An improved sampling technique in this study has permitted a more precise temporal comparison between the various bile acids in the refluxate and the oesophageal pH. Bile acids refluxed over a wide pH range although the predominant pattern was that of mixed bile acid and acid reflux as observed in the majority of patients with Barrett’s oesophagus/stricture. There was evidence, however, that bile acids can reflux independently without increased acid reflux. These patients presumably had either overwhelming reflux of relatively alkaline duodenal contents or their gastric acid production was suppressed.

A correlation study indicated a temporal relation between taurine conjugated bile acids and the presence of acid. The influence of gastric acidity on bile acid toxicity has not been investigated in humans. Animal model studies on the influence of acid on various components of duodenogastric reflux have shown a damaging potential between pepsin and taurine conjugated bile acids in acidic conditions,16 30 whereas trypsin and unconjugated bile acids have been found to be damaging in alkaline conditions.31 32 Armstrong et al,33 studying the relative toxicity of 12 bile acid fractions in a rat gastric mucosa model, showed that at neutral pH the most gastrotoxic bile acids were the unconjugated forms of the dihydroxy bile acids. They also confirmed that acidification led to precipitation of unconjugated and glycine conjugated bile acids, and was associated with diminished toxicity, while the toxicity of taurine conjugates in general was unaffected at an acidic pH. This may partly explain the reason for the higher concentration of taurine conjugates in patients with increased acid reflux when the glycine conjugates are likely to get precipitated. Nevertheless, the detection of bile acids at higher pH may explain why overall 15–20% of patients fail to respond to acid suppression therapy alone.34 It can also be speculated that by maintaining a high pH milieu it is possible that the toxicity of some of these bile acids, particularly the unconjugated fraction, could be potentiated. The pH range between 4 and 7 may represent the “danger zone” when most bile acids exist in a two phase state, the ionised and unionised phase. The unionised form of bile acids tends to diffuse through the mucosa more efficiently than the ionised form and is regarded as being more injurious.35 Although bile acids enhance H+ion permeability, there is evidence to suggest that secondary bile acids are able to cause mucosal injury independent of acid,36 with increases in amiloride sensitive Na+ conductance at the cellular level.

Unconjugated bile acids in the stomach have been found after partial gastrectomy2 37 38 and in the oesophagus after total gastrectomy,39 but they have not been shown to reflux in patients with an intact stomach. Other studies have shown that patients on long term omeprazole have diminished acid secretion, causing overgrowth of duodenal and gastric microflora,40 41 which has been associated with an increase in the concentration of the toxic unconjugated and dehydroxylated acids in the stomach.37Although no direct relation was shown in this study we believe this is a possible explanation for the detection of unconjugated bile acids in patients with oesophageal injury, the majority of whom had in the past received proton pump inhibitors over prolonged periods.

Simultaneous oesophageal bile acid assay and pH monitoring using a new technique has permitted us to perform an accurate correlation between the two components. The results of the bile acid assay were generally congruent with their known physicochemical properties. Mixed (acid and bile acid) reflux was the dominant pattern of reflux in patients with severe mucosal injury. The results support the theory that pH of the refluxate modulates the toxic effects of bile acids by influencing their concentrations and that it is possible for oesophageal mucosal damage to occur at pH greater than 4. A consistent finding of secondary bile acids in patients with Barrett’s oesophagus’s suggests that these bile acids may contribute to the metaplastic change.

Acknowledgments

A paper based on this work was presented at the British Society of Gastroenterology, Spring meeting, April 1995 (Spectrum of bile acid reflux in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease using a new device to sample the distal oesophagus), and published in abstract form (Gut1995;36(suppl 1):A29).

References

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Abbreviations:
    HPLC
    high performance liquid chromatography

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • Commentary
    M F VAEZI J E RICHTER