rss
Gut 45:435-441 doi:10.1136/gut.45.3.435
  • Liver disease

Prevalence of non-organ-specific autoantibodies and chronic liver disease in the general population: a nested case-control study of the Dionysos cohort

  1. M Lenzia,
  2. S Bellentanib,
  3. G Saccocciob,
  4. P Muratoria,
  5. F Masuttib,
  6. L Muratoria,
  7. F Cassania,
  8. F B Bianchia,
  9. C Tiribellib
  1. aDipartimento di Medicina Interna, Cardioangiologia, Epatologia Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy, bFondo per lo Studio delle Malattie del Fegato, Trieste and Modena, Italy
  1. Dr M Lenzi, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna, Cardioangiologia, Epatologia, Universita di Bologna, Policlinico S Orsola, via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
  • Accepted 17 February 1999

Abstract

BACKGROUND Several retrospective and prospective studies report an increased prevalence of non-organ-specific autoantibodies (NOSAs) in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) related chronic liver disease (CLD). Some of the data so far available are controversial and the true prevalence of NOSAs in the general population is still not known.

AIM To explore the prevalence of NOSAs, their relation to different HCV genotypes, and the presence and severity of CLD in the general population of Northern Italy.

PATIENTS All 226 anti-HCV positive and 87 hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive patients of the Dionysos cohort study were analysed and compared with sex and age matched cases (226) negative for both anti-HCV antibody and HBsAg selected from the same cohort.

METHODS Sera tested for the presence of NOSAs (anti-nuclear antibody (ANA), anti-smooth muscle antibody (SMA), and anti-liver/kidney microsomes type 1 antibody (LKM1)) were screened by indirect immunofluorescence at a 1:40 serum dilution. HCV RNA and HCV genotypes were also determined by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of the 5′ non-coding region and by PCR amplification of the core region with type specific primers.

RESULTS The overall prevalence of NOSA reactivity was significantly higher in anti-HCV positive subjects than in both normal and pathological controls (25%v 6% and 7% respectively, p<0.05). ANA, SMA, and LKM1 occurred in 16, 10, and 1.3% of cases respectively. No specific association between NOSAs and a specific HCV genotype was found. NOSAs were found more often associated with more than one genotype (35.7%) and with untypable genotypes (34.6%), although the association was not statistically significant. NOSAs were associated with HCV RNA and CLD but not with the presence of cirrhosis and/or hepatocellular carcinoma. On univariate analysis, NOSA reactivity was independently associated with abnormal alanine aminotransferase (p<0.01) and γ-glutamyltranspeptidase levels (p<0.05). The risk for the presence of NOSAs was 5.1 times higher in anti-HCV subjects than in controls.

CONCLUSIONS In the general population the prevalence of NOSAs is higher in anti-HCV positive subjects than in normal or disease controls. Moreover NOSAs are associated with CLD and with a more active disease in terms of alanine aminotransferase activity.

The presence of immunological alterations are quite common in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection. The pattern of these immunological manifestations ranges from the simple presence of non-organ-specific autoantibodies (NOSAs) (anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA), anti-smooth muscle antibodies (SMA), and anti-liver/kidney microsomal type 1 antibodies (LKM1)),1-10cryoglobulins,11-14 or anti-thyroid antibodies15 in the blood to immunological disease such as glomerulonephritis,16 lichen planus,17lymphocytic sialadenitis,18 and mixed cryoglobulinaemia.12 19 20 These associations may be interpreted as being the result of immune modulation induced by the lymphotropism of hepatitis C virus (HCV) itself21 or, as in the case of NOSAs, a manifestation secondary to the hepatocellular damage favoured by the genetic background of the host.22The relation between NOSAs and HCV is based on epidemiological evidence; the clinical significance remains to be clarified. Nevertheless the interest of this association is supported by the observation of an exacerbation of the disease activity in patients positive for NOSAs during interferon treatment, suggesting the possibility that the immunomodulatory activity of the drug may activate an autoimmune reaction and the presence of NOSAs is the hallmark of a subclinical autoimmune disease.23-25 Several studies have evaluated the prevalence of ANA and SMA in patients with HCV chronic infection as ranging between 6 and 21% and 14 and 55% respectively.1-8 LKM1 are more rarely detected (0–5%).3-6 8-10 This wide range of prevalence reflects both the heterogeneous methodology used in the detection of NOSAs and/or different selection criteria of the patient population studied. No data are available on the prevalence of these markers in an unselected series of patients with HCV related chronic hepatitis.

The Dionysos study was the first cohort study to define the prevalence of chronic liver disease (CLD) in the general population of Northern Italy. We identified this study as an original model which could be used to address the controversial issue of the prevalence of NOSAs and their relation to CLD and HCV genotypes in an unselected series of patients. We therefore designed a nested case-control study inside the Dionysos cohort.26

Materials and methods

ENROLLMENT OF PATIENTS AND COMPLIANCE

The details of the overall design of the Dionysos study have already been published.26 Briefly, all 10 151 inhabitants between 12 and 65 years of age of two Northern Italian towns received a written invitation to participate in the study. Of these, 6917 were enrolled during the two years of the study. This number represents 69% of the eligible population—that is, a large enough fraction to validate this type of study.27

This paper analyses data relative to a nested case-control study performed inside the Dionysos cohort. All 226 individuals belonging to the Dionysos cohort found to be anti-HCV positive (second generation enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)) during the first population screening, and followed up every six months for a period of three years were matched by age and sex with 226 subjects randomly selected in the group of subjects of the same study that were negative for anti-HCV, with the same proportion in the town of origin as observed in anti-HCV positive patients. All 87 patients found to be positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in the same study were also chosen as another disease control group. Therefore, 539 subjects in total were analysed for the presence of NOSA reactivity.

INITIAL EVALUATION

The details of the overall design of the Dionysos study have been reported elsewhere.26 For each, the following was performed. (a) A medical history was obtained including family history of hepatitis in cohabiting people, presence of gallstone disease, history of past surgical operations, blood transfusions before 1990, drug abuse, dental procedures, dog or other domestic animal bites, homosexuality, acupuncture. The use of drugs was also registered. (b) A semiquantitative colour illustrated food questionnaire, including detailed questions on the use of alcoholic beverages (wine, beer, alcoholic aperitifs, hard liquor) and the dose, duration of use, and time of drinking, was administered. Daily alcohol intake (in g) was computed by multiplying the frequency of consumption of each unit of beverage by the alcohol content of the specified portions.27 (c) A detailed physical examination was carried out aimed at detecting physical signs related to CLD including height, weight, calculation of body mass index, left wrist circumference, presence of jaundice, scleral icterus, excoriation of skin, ascites, pretibial oedema, flapping tremor, spider naevi, palmar erythema, liver enlargement, palpable spleen. (d) A blood sample was taken for determination of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and γ-glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT) activity, mean cell volume, platelet, erythrocyte, and leucocyte count, HBsAg, anti-HBs (Abbott Diagnostic Kits, North Chicago, Illinois, USA) and anti-HCV (ELISA, second generation; Ortho Diagnostic Kits, Raritan, New Jersey, USA). Each serum sample was divided under sterile conditions into three aliquots of 2 ml and kept at −80°C until used.

The diagnosis of cirrhosis was clinically suspected when at least two of the following features were present: (a) spider naevi, scleral icterus, palmar erythema, ascites, flapping tremor, hepatic or splenic enlargement; (b) platelet count less than 140 000/mm3; (c) portal vein diameter greater than 12 mm or irregular margins of the liver parenchyma at ultrasonography.

FOLLOW UP OF ANTI-HCV POSITIVE SUBJECTS

Each participant initially positive for anti-HCV (and confirmed to be positive by third generation ELISA and recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA; Chiron Corp, Emeryville, California, USA)) and each subject for whom the diagnosis of cirrhosis was suspected clinically (see above) underwent the following additional procedures every six months for at least three years. (a) Baseline blood tests were repeated, and serum alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin, albumin, γ globulin, prothrombin time, and α fetoprotein were also determined; blood assays of glucose, cholesterol, and triglycerides were also performed. (b) Ultrasonography of the liver, biliary system, pancreas, and spleen was performed, with measurement of portal vein and retropancreatic splenic vein diameters. All sonograms were performed by one operator.

CLASSIFICATION OF CLD

The diagnosis of cirrhosis and/or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was suspected clinically according to the criteria reported above and confirmed by percutaneous liver biopsy in 36 subjects (27 anti-HCV positive, eight HbsAg positive, and one case-control with alcoholic cirrhosis). HCC was diagnosed in five anti-HCV positive patients (four with cirrhosis). All the anti-HCV subjects with ALT more than 1.5 times the upper limit of normal in at least two measurements following one month interval checks were asked to undergo percutaneous liver biopsy. Of these, 55 met the criteria, and 53 had biopsies. Two patients with ALT more than 1.5 times the upper limit of normal, but without clinically suspected cirrhosis, declined to have a biopsy.

Finally, all 539 subjects of this nested case-control study underwent two consecutive one month interval checks of ALT and GGT during the last year of follow up. When the diagnosis of cirrhosis and/or HCC was reached (see above) and when either ALT or GGT were above the upper normal range, the subject was considered to have CLD.

VIROLOGICAL STUDIES

Anti-HCV antibodies were tested by the second generation immunoenzymatic screening test ORTHO-HCV (Ortho diagnostic Kits) and confirmed by recombinant immunoblot assay when positive. Serum HCV RNA was tested by “nested” PCR using primers for 5′-untranslated region. This test was performed in all subjects positive for anti-HCV in the serum sample at presentation, and, in the case of a negative result, the test was repeated in serum samples collected during the follow up.

HCV genotypes were determined by PCR amplification of the core region as described by Okamoto and co-workers.28 Each HCV type was characterised by a different nucleotide length: 49 for type 1a, 144 for type 1b, 174 for type 2a, and 123 for type 2b. When a double infection was suspected because of the presence of several bands, a second PCR was separately repeated with each of four type-specific antisense primers. Table 1 gives the primers used. As an additional type (3a) of HCV has been recently described, the above method was slightly modified by using primers able to detect type 3a of HCV. A sense primer was added in the first PCR and a new pair of primers in the second PCR (table 1). Using these primers, a specific 88 bp long product could be obtained.

Table 1

Primers used for polymerase chain reaction amplification of the core region of hepatitis C virus

AUTOANTIBODY TESTING

ANA, SMA, LKM1, and anti-mitochondrial antibodies were searched for by indirect immunofluorescence (IFL) on cryostat sections of rat liver and kidney at a serum dilution of 1:40 as suggested by Johnsonet al.29 Positive reactions were titred by double dilution to the end point. ANA positive sera were subsequently tested at the same dilution by IFL on HEp-2 cells (Kallestad, Chaska, Minnesota, USA); homogeneous and other ANA patterns were identified according to established criteria.30Anti-double-stranded DNA was tested by IFL onCrithidia luciliae.

Anti-extractable nuclear antigen (ENA) reactivities and XR1precipitin system were tested by counterimmunoelectrophoresis with rabbit thymus extract (Pel-Freez, Rogers, Arkansas, USA).

Anti-actin specificity was identified on the basis of a SMAg (staining of the vessel walls plus glomerular mesangium) or SMAt pattern (all the above plus staining of filamentous peritubular structures) by IFL on kidney sections as described by Bottazzo et al 31 and by positivity for the XR1 precipitating system by counterimmunoelectrophoresis with rabbit thymus extract. The XR1 precipitin line is immunologically distinct from each of the most common ENA systems (Sm, NRNP, SS-A, SS-B, Jo-1, and Scl-70) which are routinely detected using the same technical procedure. The above reactivities have been shown to be closely associated with anti-actin reactivity.32

LKM1 and anti-mitochondrial antibody reactivities were further evaluated by immunoblotting on rat liver microsomes and bovine heart mitochondrial preparations respectively, at a serum dilution of 1:500.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Statistical analysis was performed with an SPSS/PC statistical package (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois, USA). All p values reported are two-tailed. Statistical comparison between means was calculated by one way analysis of variance, and, when the variances were not homogeneous, with the Kruskal-Wallis one way analysis of variance.33

The association between the presence of NOSA positivity and different variables (anti-HCV positivity, HCV RNA positivity, different HCV genotypes; the persistent presence of either ALT activity higher than 40 U/l or GGT activity higher than 50 U/l; the presence of CLD as defined above and the presence of cirrhosis/HCC) were assessed with the univariate unadjusted χ2 statistic.34 Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were also calculated.35 The multivariate analysis was carried out by a linear logistic regression model,36 with a stepwise variable selection procedure (level for entry = 0.1, level for stay = 0.5). The models explain either the probability of NOSA positivity according to the different HCV genotypes or the probability of NOSA positivity according to the presence of CLD or cirrhosis/HCC in the nested case-control population studied (n = 539). Independently from the selection criteria used, age and daily alcohol intake (in g/day) were always considered in the multivariate analysis in order to improve model fitting.

Results

Table 2 reports the demographic, clinical, and biochemical features of the population studied at baseline as well as those of the control groups. The mean (SD) age of the anti-HCV positive patients and case-controls was 52 (12) years. HbsAgpositive patients were all HBV DNA negative except one, with a slight prevalence of men and a mean age of 43 (11). ALT and γ-globulin levels were significantly higher and a diagnosis of CLD significantly more common in anti-HCV positive patients than in case-controls and HBsAg positive patients (p<0.05).

Table 2

Demographic, clinical and biochemical features of the population studied

Table 3 gives the overall prevalence of NOSAs in the population studied and control groups. Autoantibodies were found in 57/226 (25%) subjects positive for anti-HCV with a median titre of 1:40 (range 1:40–1:1280), in 6/87 (7%) subjects positive for HBsAg, and in 14/226 (6%) healthy controls (median titre 1:40; range 40–320). The prevalence was significantly higher in the former than in the two latter groups (p<0.05). ANA reactivity was more often observed (36/226; 16%) in anti-HCV positive than in control groups (8/226 (3.5%) and 2/87 (2.3%) respectively). The homogeneous pattern on HEp-2 cells was observed in 3/36 (8%) anti-HCV positive cases (titres 1:40, 1:80, and 1:160 respectively) and in 1/14 (7%) case-controls (titre 1:80). None of the ANA positive sera were positive for anti-double-stranded DNA or anti-ENA. SMA reactivity was found in 22/226 (10%) anti-HCV positive patients and 6/226 (2.6%) and 4/87 (4.6%) case-controls and disease controls respectively. The SMAg and SMAt IFL pattern was present in two anti-HCV positive patients and in one control. None of the SMA positive sera showed XR1 precipitating reactivity, indicating an anti-actin specificity. The concomitant reactivity for ANA and SMA was shown only in 5/226 (2.2%) anti-HCV subjects (median titre 1:80; range 1:40–1:160) and never in the control groups. The prevalence of NOSAs was significantly higher in patients with CLD (p<0.05). LKM1 reactivity was found only in three anti-HCV positive cases (1.3%) with a titre of 1:80 in one serum sample and 1:1280 in the remaining two. These three sera all reacted in immunoblots with a 50 kDa rat liver microsomal peptide. One serum sample from an anti-HCV positive female patient with CLD was positive by IFL for anti-mitochondrial antibody with a titre of 1:1280. When tested by immunoblotting on bovine heart mitochondria, the above serum sample showed a reactivity against 74, 52, and 51 kDa peptides typical for M2 specificity.

Table 3

Prevalence (expressed as column percentage in the table) of different non-organ-specific autoantibodies (NOSAs) within the population studied in relation to the presence of chronic liver disease (CLD)

Table 4 reports the prevalence of NOSAs within the different classes of HCV genotype. No specific association between NOSAs and a specific HCV genotype was found. Interestingly, higher NOSA prevalence was found in HCV RNA positive patients infected with two or more genotypes (35.7%) or with untypable genotypes (34.6%). LKM1 was found in association with HCV genotype 1b in two cases and with untypable genotypes in the third.

Table 4

Prevalence and titre of non-organ-specific autoantibodies (NOSA) within the different classes of hepatitic C virus (HCV) genotypes

Anti-HCV positive patients and case-controls, with the exclusion of HbsAg positive patients, were compared by different variables using univariate analysis. The results showed an association between serum autoantibody positivity and both anti-HCV or HCV RNA positivity and the presence of CLD (p<0.001, p<0.05 and p<0.05 respectively), but not with the presence of cirrhosis and/or HCC (table 5). With regard to the biochemical variables, NOSA reactivity was shown to be independently associated with abnormal levels of ALT (p<0.001) and GGT (p<0.05). Analysing the NOSA specificity, ALT alteration was associated also with SMA reactivity (p<0.05), and GGT with ANA (p<0.05). Moreover, the risk of cirrhosis and/or HCC was 3.8 times higher (range 1–14.1, p<0.05) when both SMA positivity and genotype 1b were present. No significant differences were found between HBsAg positive patients and case-controls. Finally, the overall risk for the presence of autoantibodies was 5.1 times higher (range 2.8–9.6) in anti-HCV positive subjects than in case-controls (p<0.05) and it was similar for ANA and SMA specificities (odds ratio = 5.2 (range 2.4–11.5) and 4 (range 1.6–10.1) respectively).

Table 5

Univariate analysis of alterations in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and γ-glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT), and the presence of chronic liver disease (CLD) and cirrhosis for non-organ-specific autoantibody (NOSA) reactivity in the population of anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) positive subjects (n=226) and their matched case controls (n=226). HbsAg positive subjects were excluded from the analysis. Absolute number (n), percentage of row (%) and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidential intervals (CI) are also reported

Multivariate analysis of the data, after correction for age and daily alcohol intake, showed that none of the NOSA specificity was significantly associated with the presence of either CLD or cirrhosis/HCC. The NOSA specificity that was closest to statistical significance for the presence of cirrhosis/HCC was LKM1 reactivity (p = 0.150; data not shown). When the probability of NOSA positivity according to HCV genotype was explored by multiple logistic regression, after correction for age and daily alcohol intake, NOSA positivity was found to be significantly correlated (p = 0.0007) with the presence of two or three genotypes, with the presence of an “untypable” genotype (p = 0.0007), and with the presence of genotype 1b (p = 0.006).

Discussion

The true prevalence of CLD and cirrhosis and its clinical and biochemical characteristics in most of the studies published reflects the selection criteria used in each study. The Dionysos cohort study evaluates, for the first time, the prevalence and incidence of CLD in the general population of Northern Italy. A sample of 6917 citizens, aged 12 to 65, from two towns characterised by the same socioeconomic background was analysed. From the data obtained in this study, the prevalence of hepatitis B virus and HCV positivity was 1.3 and 3.2% respectively. The overall prevalence of HCV RNA positive patients was 2.3%. The anti-HCV positive cohort members were deemed to be the ideal series of patients in which to evaluate the prevalence of NOSAs associated with HCV infection, in a general population, and their correlation with CLD and biochemical variables of liver disease activity. We regarded them as an ideal cohort given the absence of selection bias that characterises the retrospective and prospective studies already published.

There is a general consensus that serum autoantibodies are commonly found in patients with hepatitis C (about one third of all cases). The overall prevalence of NOSAs found in this study (25%) is only slightly lower than that observed in previous reports from Europe2 3 6 9 and the United States in which the same screening dilution (1:40) (as recommended in adults) was used.4 5 7 8 10 This also confirms that, in an unselected population, this phenomenon is specifically associated with HCV infection. The prevalence of NOSAs in our disease control group (HbsAg positive patients) is very low compared with those reported in the literature4 5 36; this probably reflects the fact that most of our patients were in a non-replicative state and had inactive liver disease. We observed a higher prevalence of ANA (16%) than SMA positivity (10%), in contrast with some previous reports,4-6 but in accordance with the results of Czajaet al.36 There is no obvious explanation for this finding, but interestingly the same relation between the two reactivities is also present in the case-controls group. LKM1 was found only in anti-HCV/HCV RNA positive patients with a prevalence of 1.3%. This confirms the specific association between this rare autoantibody and HCV infection. The prevalence of LKM1 found in this study is significantly lower than that observed in most European studies.1-3 9 36 This result can be explained by assuming that in most European studies there is a selection bias for LKM1 positive patients, possibly because of the long term interest in this antibody on the part of certain authors. The prevalence of LKM1 is in fact similar to that reported in certain American studies.5 10 This would suggest that the association of this autoantibody and HCV infection is geographically independent. From this we would also infer that the difference in the prevalence of LKM1 in HCV infected patients reported in American and European cohorts is selection based.

The analysis of ANA and SMA subspecificities shows that most of the autoantibodies detected in this study were ANA with a speckled pattern, and SMA were directed against cytoskeletal proteins (intermediate filaments) other than actin. Only 3/36 (8%) of the anti-HCV positive subjects showed an ANA with a homogeneous pattern similar to that usually associated with autoimmune hepatitis, while anti-actin specificity was never detected. Therefore the overlap between autoimmune and viral hepatitis in terms of autoantibody specificities is very low in this study and confirms that ANA with a homogeneous pattern is less specific than anti-actin for the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis, as it has been detected in few cases of anti-HCV positive and control cases (1/14; 7%). Comparing the results obtained in this study with those reported by Cassani et al in both a retrospective2 and prospective37 series of anti-HCV positive patients, we observe that, although the overall prevalence of NOSAs is similar in the two studies, the prevalence of the subspecificities of homogeneous ANA and SMA with anti-actin is significantly lower. This difference can be explained in the light of the patients studied and suggests that, in unselected patients, the overlap between chronic hepatitis C with autoimmune features and autoimmune hepatitis is very low both in terms of autoantibody specificity and titre. Moreover, these findings indicate that most of the autoimmune reactions that often occur in association with HCV infection are those typically described in various viral disorders,38-40 probably favoured by the protracted stimulation of the immune system by a direct effect of HCV on lymphocytes and on the basis of a particular genetic background of the host.

The association between the presence of NOSAs and the clinical, biochemical, and histological picture of HCV related CLD is still controversial. Several reports have failed to identify the presence of NOSAs as an untoward factor for CLD. The study of Cassaniet al 37 showed for the first time, in a prospective series of patients with HCV related CLD who were positive for autoantibodies, a biochemical and histological activity higher than that of patients with no markers of autoimmunity. These results are strengthened by the observations obtained in this study confirming in unselected patients that the presence of NOSAs is significantly associated with the presence of CLD, with HCV infection in a replicative state (presence of HCV RNA), and with higher levels of ALT and GGT. More specifically a link between the presence of reactivity for SMA and HCV genotype 1b and cirrhosis has also been shown. These data are insufficient to prove a direct relation between NOSAs and the progression of liver damage. In fact, a hypothetical immune mechanism of liver damage is still unproven, and “viral autoimmunity” has so far been considered to be a simple consequence of the severity of liver damage without any active role. However, the cumulative data that associate NOSAs with the progression of liver disease indicate that their evaluation is important, at least as a marker of liver disease activity during HCV infection. Further investigation is required to understand their significance better.

In conclusion, evaluation of autoimmune phenomena associated with HCV infection, in an unselected Northern Italian population, has confirmed that NOSAs are commonly associated with HCV infection. The overall specificities of these autoantibodies account for the autoimmunity associated with viral infections, and the overlap with autoimmune hepatitis is negligible. Interestingly, they correlate with the activity of liver disease, suggesting a hypothetical role in the progression of liver damage.

Footnotes

  • Abbreviations used in this paper:
    NOSA
    non-organ-specific autoantibody
    HCV
    hepatitis C virus
    CLD
    chronic liver disease
    HCC
    hepatocellular carcinoma
    HBsAg
    hepatitis B surface antigen
    IFL indirect immunofluorescence
    ANA, anti-nuclear antibodies
    SMA
    anti-smooth muscle antibodies
    LKM1
    anti-liver/kidney microsomes type 1 antibodies
    PCR
    polymerase chain reaction
    ELISA
    enzyme linked immunosorbent assay
    ALT
    alanine aminotransferase
    AST
    aspartate aminotransferase
    GGT
    γ-glutamyltranspeptidase

References