Article Text

PDF

Replication error phenotype, clinicopathological variables, and patient outcome in Dukes' B stage II (T3,N0,M0) colorectal cancer
  1. B Currana,
  2. K Lenehanb,
  3. H Mulcahyc,
  4. O Tigheb,
  5. M A Bennettb,
  6. E W Kaya,
  7. D P O'Donoghuec,
  8. M Leadera,
  9. D T Crokeb
  1. aDepartment of Pathology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Republic of Ireland, bDepartment of Biochemistry, cGastroenterology and Liver Unit, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
  1. Dr D T Croke, Department of Biochemistry, The Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123, St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Republic of Ireland.

Abstract

AIMS To examine the relation between the replication error (RER) phenotype and other genetic events, clinical features, and long term survival in patients with Dukes' B stage II (T3,N0,M0) colorectal cancer.

METHODS RER phenotype was investigated in 159 patients by PCR amplification of microsatellite marker loci on chromosomes 5q, 17p, 17q, and 18q from tumour DNA extracted from archival tissue. Data on activating c-Ki-ras mutations were available from a previous study. Immunohistochemical detection of p53 and c-erbB-2 expression was performed on paraffin wax embedded tissue.

RESULTS Of 159 colorectal cancers studied, 22 (14%) were RER+ while 137 (86%) were RER− for two or more loci. RER+ tumours were more commonly located in the right colon, tended to be larger than RER− tumours, and were more often poorly differentiated than RER− cancers. No significant associations were seen between RER status and the presence of a mutant c-Ki-ras gene, or between RER status and p53, c-erbB-2, or c-myc gene expression. Univariate survival analysis showed that outcome was similar in RER+ and RER− cases. Multivariate survival analysis showed that the relative risk of death for patients with RER+ cancers was 0.95 that of patients with RER− cancers.

CONCLUSIONS The results suggest that, while the RER phenotype may be associated with some differences in tumour pathology (site, size, differentiation), it is not associated with the genetic alterations studied or with significant differences in long term survival.

  • colon cancer
  • replication error phenotype
  • microsatellite instability
  • c-Ki-rasmutation
  • p53 expression
  • c-erbB-2

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Sporadic colorectal cancer serves as an important model for human carcinogenesis and the molecular pathogenesis of this disease has been extensively studied. This has led to the accepted model of a stepwise progression from normal mucosa to metastatic colorectal cancer via adenomatous polyp formation and invasive cancer, associated with accumulating mutations in a number of growth regulating genes.1-4 Alterations include the activation of oncogenes5 and the inactivation, by a combination of mutation and deletion, of tumour suppressor genes.1 More recently, the study of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) has helped to identify a new class of tumour susceptibility gene, namely the mismatch repair gene.6 Inherited mutation in one of a number of genes identified to date (including hMSH2, hMLH1, hPMS1, hPMS2) results in defective repair of mismatched bases and leads to a replication error positive (RER+) phenotype and microsatellite instability in HNPCC individuals.7-11 These patients tend to develop right sided, predominantly diploid, and often poorly differentiated cancers at an early age.12

Although microsatellite instability was initially associated with HNPCC, it is not limited to such tumours, but is also found in 7–20% of sporadic colorectal cancers.11 13-17 However, a number of important genotypic and phenotypic differences have been found between inherited and sporadic RER+ tumours. Patients with inherited RER+ tumours tend to have germline mutations within the currently known DNA mismatch repair genes, whereas sporadic RER+ tumours tend not to have germline mismatch repair gene alterations and rarely harbour such mutations in their tumours.18 19 In addition, a positive family history of colorectal cancer is no more prevalent in patients with sporadic RER+ tumours than those with RER− tumours.16 This indicates that additional, as yet unidentified, genetic events may affect replication fidelity in sporadic cancer,19 with an alternative pathway leading to an RER+ phenotype in these cases.20 Furthermore, these differences also suggest that the clinical features associated with RER+ sporadic cancers may be different to those associated with RER+ HNPCC cancers.

Only a small number of studies have analysed microsatellite instability in relation to the clinical, pathological, or molecular features of sporadic colorectal cancer and all have included a mixture of early and advanced cases.13 19 However, the anatomical extent of sporadic colorectal cancer is closely related to long term survival,21 cellular differentiation,22 and the occurrence of genetic alterations. Thus, studies which include both early and advanced tumours without adequate correction for tumour stage are likely to have biases inherent in them. The aim of our study was to examine the relation between microsatellite instability and other genetic events, clinical features, and long term survival in patients with colorectal cancer. However, to eliminate the confounding effect of tumour stage on microsatellite instability, we only included patients who underwent potentially curative surgery for cancers which had penetrated beyond the bowel wall but which had not breached the peritoneal surface, spread to other organs, or metastasised to lymph nodes or distant sites at the time of operation (T3,N0,M0).

Methods

PATIENTS

A series of 159 consecutive patients with T3,N0,M0 (Dukes' B, stage II) colorectal cancer (median age 69.7 years, range 40.7–90.0; 77 women, 82 men) admitted to St Vincent's Hospital, Dublin, between 1983 and 1989 formed the basis of the study. Clinical data were extracted from a prospective computer database containing details of all colorectal cancer patients admitted since 1983. No study patient received preoperative or postoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Follow up for this study ended in February 1996, and median follow up was 7.9 years (mean 7.9 years; range 5.0–11.5) for patients alive at the completion of follow up. The pathologist and technical investigators were blinded to all clinical details and patient outcome. Histological sections were retrieved and evaluated to confirm tumour stage and tumour differentiation, and to select suitable formalin fixed, paraffin wax embedded tissue blocks for DNA extraction and immunohistochemistry. Tumour DNA was extracted from blocks containing at least 70% tumour cells and wild type DNA was obtained from blocks containing only normal tissue. DNA was extracted by a boiling/proteinase K method as described previously.23 The presence of c-Ki-ras activating mutations in these samples has been investigated previously by a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based method.23

DETECTION OF MICROSATELLITE INSTABILITY

Highly polymorphic microsatellite markers linked to four tumour suppressor gene loci were used to detect microsatellite instability as allele mobility shifts. The microsatellite markers studied included D5S82 and D5S346 (chromosome 5q), TP53 (chromosome 17p), D18S474 and DCC1.1/1.2 (chromosome 18q), and D17S579, NM23, and D17S293 (chromosome 17q). Template DNA was amplified by PCR with primers specific for each marker using previously reported reagents and reaction conditions.24-29 PCR products were electrophoresed on standard DNA sequencing gels and visualised either by autoradiography (following incorporation of radiolabel during PCR) or by automated fluorescent detection (ALFexpress DNA Sequencer, Pharmacia, Sweden). Microsatellite instability was indicated by the presence of allelic shifts whereby one or more different alleles were present in tumour DNA as compared with the matched normal sample. A case was designated RER+ if at least two of the markers studied reproducibly exhibited allelic shifts.16

DETECTION OF p53 AND c-erbB-2 (p185her-2/neu) EXPRESSION

Sections (5 μm) were prepared for immunohistochemistry as described previously.23 30 31 Cases displaying unequivocal strong nuclear staining with the NCL-p53-CM1 antibody (Novocastra, UK) were considered positive for p53.23 32Focal or diffuse c-erbB-2 staining with the NCL-CB11 antibody (Novocastra) was regarded as positive for c-erbB-2 expression.30 Intense nuclear staining with the primary monoclonal antibody OM-11–908 (Cambridge Research Biochemicals, UK) was scored as positivity for c-myc expression.33 34

STATISTICAL METHODS

Categorical data were compared with the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated with a correction factor of 0.5.35 Non-parametric data were assessed with Wilcoxon's rank sum test. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed with cancer related death as the end point. Differences in survival between groups were compared using the log rank test. Multivariate survival analyses were performed with the Cox proportional hazards model using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, Illinois, USA). Model assumptions were checked by observing constant vertical differences between plots of the logarithm of the integrated hazard function for each variable.36 Probability values less than 0.05 were considered significant in all analyses.

Results

Of the 159 colorectal cancers studied, 22 (14%) were found to be RER+ while 137 (86%) were RER− for two or more loci. The median age of patients with RER+ tumours was 67 years compared with 70 years for those with RER− cancers (p=0.89; table 1). RER+ tumours were found more commonly located in the right colon (p=0.006), tended to be larger than RER− tumours (p=0.01), and were more often poorly differentiated than RER− cancers (p=0.0008). A number of DNA based and immunohistochemical assays were used to assess the relation between tumour RER status and other molecular features (table 2). No significant associations were seen between RER status and the presence of a mutant c-Ki-ras gene, or between RER status and p53, c-erbB-2, or c-myc gene expression. Table 3 lists the clinical, molecular, and immunohistochemical findings for the 22 RER+ cases.

Table 1

Clinical and pathological features of 159 patients with T3,N0,M0 colorectal cancer stratified by replication error (RER) status

Table 2

Molecular and immunohistochemical features of 159 patients with T3,N0,M0 colorectal cancer stratified by replication error (RER) status

Table 3

Clinical, pathological, and molecular features of 22 patients with replication error (RER) positive T3,N0,M0 colorectal cancers

Univariate survival analysis showed that outcome was similar in RER+ and RER− cases (log rank test, p=0.68; fig 1). To allow for possible confounding factors, we entered RER status, patient age, tumour differentiation, tumour site, and tumour size into a multivariate survival analysis. This showed that the relative risk of death for patients with RER+ cancers was 0.95 that of patients with RER− cancers (95% confidence interval, 0.41–2.17; p=0.90).

Figure 1

Survival of 159 patients with T3,N0,M0 colorectal cancer stratified by replication error (RER) status.

Discussion

Tumour development is a multistage process, involving many changes in the nuclear material of the cell. These changes result in significant alterations in the cellular phenotype including the control of cell growth and division. Vogelstein and colleagues1have outlined some of the genetic changes specific to colorectal tumour progression from adenoma to carcinoma including DNA hypomethylation, activation of oncogenes, and inactivation of tumour suppressor genes. The multistep nature of colorectal cancer progression involving some or all of the above genes is widely accepted.3 4 37However, there has been considerable speculation as to whether microsatellite instability reflected the presence of a fundamentally different pathway to malignancy, or if it merely represented a variation on a relatively consistent theme of oncogene activation and tumour suppressor gene loss. Based on an inverse association between microsatellite instability and the presence of c-Ki-ras and p53 mutations, Ionov and colleagues15 suggested that microsatellite instability might form the basis for an entirely new mechanism for carcinogenesis. Thibodeau and colleagues17 also showed a significant inverse relation between microsatellite instability and loss of heterozygosity at chromosomes 5q, 17p, and 18q. However, more recently, a considerable body of evidence has accumulated in the literature which suggests that microsatellite instability does indeed characterise a second parallel pathway to malignancy.38 Genomic instability has now been shown to give rise to genetic alterations in loci including TGFβ1RII39 and IGFIIR.40Indeed, a link has recently been reported between abnormal genomic imprinting and microsatellite instability in colon tumours.41

A study by Kim and colleagues42 showed that right sided RER+ tumours expressed lower levels of p53 product than RER− cases. However, these data appear to contradict the results of many other studies. Aaltonen and colleagues13 found c-Ki-ras and APC gene mutations in a similar proportion of RER+ and RER− colorectal cancers, while Watatani and colleagues43 and Ilyas and colleagues32 found that p53 gene mutation or overexpression was no more frequent in RER− than in RER+ colorectal cancers. Furthermore, although Konishiet al found that mutation of the APC, c-Ki-ras, and p53 genes occurred more frequently in HNPCC RER+ tumours than in sporadic RER+ tumours, they found no difference in the incidence of mutation in these genes between sporadic RER+ and RER− tumours.19 Loss of heterozygosity at chromosomes 5q, 8p, 17p, 18q, and 22q also occurred no more frequently in sporadic RER+ than in RER− tumours.19 Our data, indicating the fact that c-Ki-rasalterations and p53, c-erb, and c-myc protein overexpression occur with similar frequencies in sporadic RER+ and RER− cancers agree with these latter studies. However, table 2 indicates that there may be a trend towards a lower rate of K-rasalterations in RER+ tumours and a higher rate of c-erbB-2 immunostaining in these cases. Thus, we cannot exclude the possibility of a type 2 error in these data.

It is clear that the presence of an RER+ genotype has either some influence on, or at least an association with, a number of clinical and pathological characteristics of sporadic tumours. In accordance with almost all previous studies, we found that RER+ tumours tended to be right sided and poorly differentiated. In addition, RER+ tumours within this anatomically homogeneous series of colorectal cancers tended to be larger than in the RER− cases. The reason for this is unclear, although it is possible that the presence of an RER+ genotype may lead to enhanced growth characteristics without affecting the ability of a tumour to invade or metastasise to lymph nodes or distant organs.

The stage of the primary tumour at the time of initial operation is known to influence greatly the long term survival of colorectal cancer patients. Thus, we specifically omitted all but T3,N0,M0 (stage II) cases in an attempt to minimise any survival bias caused by variable anatomical staging of RER+ and RER− cases. In addition, we studied a series of patients with adequate follow up times to reduce the possibility of missing late, but potentially important, survival effects induced by RER status. Our 10 year survival analysis showed no difference between RER+ and RER− stage II cases. Even when entered into a multivariate analysis along with other possibly important confounding variables such as tumour grade, survival was almost identical in both RER+ and RER− cases. These results initially appear to be at variance with some earlier studies, but close examination shows that this is not the case. Lothe et al,16 in a series of 238 patients with colorectal cancer of variable stages, found that patients with RER+ tumours had a significantly better seven year survival rate than those with RER− cancers. However, this association between RER status and long term survival disappeared when the data were corrected for tumour stage in a multivariate analysis. Thibodeau and colleagues17 also found a positive association between the presence of microsatellite instability and outcome in the first four years after surgery, but no significant association in stage II or III cancers. It is probable that further studies examining a consecutive series of colorectal cancers of different tumour stages and assessing additional genetic alterations, will clarify the association between RER status, tumour progression, and clinical outcome. However, the above results suggest that if RER status does indeed have an important bearing on long term survival, then the effect is likely to be seen more prominently either in cases confined to the bowel wall or in those which have already metastasised to lymph nodes or to distant organs at the time of operation.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Health Research Board of Ireland and from the Research Committee of the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland.

References

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Abbreviations used in this paper:
    HNPCC
    hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer
    RER
    replication error

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.