Article Text

Download PDFPDF
COX-2 inhibitors and the gastrointestinal tract
  1. I Bjarnason,
  2. K D Rainsford*
  1. Department of Medicine, Guy's, King's, St Thomas' Medical School, London, UK and *Department of Biological Sciences, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
  1. Dr I Bjarnason, Department of Medicine, Guy's, King's, St Thomas's Medical School, Bessemer Road, London SE5 9PJ, UK.ingvar.bjarnason{at}kcl.ac.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

The discovery of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) a decade ago heralded one of the most rapid and expensive development and marketing of a new class of drug that we have witnessed. This has resulted in publication of an interesting mixture of exceptionally high quality basic and clinical research. Based on the COX dogma, that COX-1 isgood and COX-2 isbad, we were promised equal therapeutic efficacy to conventional non-steroidal inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with the COX-2 selective inhibitors and absence of gastrointestinal side effects that otherwise represent a significant public health problem. Have these promises come to fruition?

The semantic problem about the term COX-2 selective agents is acknowledged,1-3 but for our purpose (accepting that nimesulide and etodolac, at least, have …

View Full Text