Article Text

PDF

CORRECTION

Statistics from Altmetric.com

In the BSG abstract supplement published in April, abstract 402 by Davies et al (Gut 2002;50(Suppl II):A109) contained an error. The sensitivity and specificity for recurrence were given as 85.7% and 71.4% respectively. The correct result should be a reversal of these values, with sensitivity being 71.4% and specificity being 85.7%. The authors apologise for the error.

View Abstract

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • Abstracts
    BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology