Article Text

PDF

An important pitfall in diagnosing gall bladder cancer
  1. J Feisthammel1,
  2. K Caca1,
  3. J Mössner1,
  4. T Kahn2,
  5. R Kluge3
  1. 1Department of Internal Medicine II, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
  2. 2Department of Radiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
  3. 3Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
  1. Correspondence to:
    Professor K Caca
    Department of Internal Medicine II, University of Leipzig, Philipp-Rosenthal-Str 27, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; cacamedizin.uni-leipzig.de

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Clinical presentation

A 72 year old male was admitted for recurrent right upper abdominal pain, intermittent fever, and 12 kg weight loss over a period of six months. Some liver enzymes were elevated (that is, alkaline phosphatase 10.14 µmol/l/s (norm 1.77–4.4), gamma glutamyl transferase 7.81 µmol/l/s (0.18–0.83)). CA 19-9 was within the normal range. Abdominal ultrasound revealed cholestasis, a thickened gall bladder wall, and suspected bile duct stones. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography showed a proximal common bile duct and hilar stenosis, highly suspicious of gall bladder or bile duct cancer. Biopsies were taken showing dysplastic epithelium. Contrast enhanced ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography scanning were performed, revealing a hilar infiltration (34 mm) and a thickened gall bladder wall compatible with gall bladder cancer (fig 1A–C). Positron emission tomography (PET) with [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG-PET) identified two metabolically active areas in the region of the gall bladder and the hilus (fig 1D). Taken together, a diagnosis of gall bladder cancer was made. Due to comorbidities and local tumour extension, the patient was treated with palliative insertion of plastic bile duct stents.

Figure 1

 Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (A), magnetic resonance imaging (B), and computed tomography scanning (B) of the gall bladder, and [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (D, E).

Question

What is the most probable clinical course of the patient?

See page 1664 for answer

This case is submitted by:

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Robin Spiller, Editor

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • Miscellaneous
    BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology