Article Text

PDF
Increased colonic pain sensitivity in irritable bowel syndrome is the result of an increased tendency to report pain rather than increased neurosensory sensitivity
  1. Spencer D Dorn1,
  2. Olafur S Palsson1,
  3. Syed I M Thiwan1,
  4. Motoyori Kanazawa2,
  5. W Crawford Clark3,
  6. Miranda A L van Tilburg1,
  7. Douglas A Drossman1,
  8. Yolanda Scarlett1,
  9. Rona L Levy4,
  10. Yehuda Ringel1,
  11. Michael D Crowell5,
  12. Kevin W Olden6,
  13. William E Whitehead1
  1. 1Center for Functional GI and Motility Disorders, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
  2. 2Department of Behavioral Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
  3. 3Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
  4. 4School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
  5. 5Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
  6. 6Division of Gastroenterology, University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR, USA
  1. Correspondence to:
    Dr William E Whitehead
    Center for Functional GI and Motility Disorders, University of North Carolina, Campus Box 7080, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7080, USA; william_whitehead{at}med.unc.edu

Abstract

Objective: The aim was to determine whether lower visceral pain thresholds in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) primarily reflect physiological or psychological factors.

Methods: Firstly, 121 IBS patients and 28 controls underwent balloon distensions in the descending colon using the ascending methods of limits (AML) to assess pain and urge thresholds. Secondly, sensory decision theory analysis was used to separate physiological from psychological components of perception: neurosensory sensitivity (p(A)) was measured by the ability to discriminate between 30 mm Hg vs 34 mm Hg distensions; psychological influences were measured by the report criterion—that is, the overall tendency to report pain, indexed by the median intensity rating for all distensions, independent of intensity. Psychological symptoms were assessed using the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI).

Results: IBS patients had lower AML pain thresholds (median: 28 mm Hg vs 40 mm Hg; p<0.001), but similar neurosensory sensitivity (median p(A): 0.5 vs 0.5; p = 0.69; 42.6% vs 42.9% were able to discriminate between the stimuli better than chance) and a greater tendency to report pain (median report criterion: 4.0 (“mild” pain) vs 5.2 (“weak” pain); p = 0.003). AML pain thresholds were not correlated with neurosensory sensitivity (r = −0.13; p = 0.14), but were strongly correlated with report criterion (r = 0.67; p<0.0001). Report criterion was inversely correlated with BSI somatisation (r = −0.26; p = 0.001) and BSI global score (r = −0.18; p = 0.035). Similar results were seen for the non-painful sensation of urgency.

Conclusion: Increased colonic sensitivity in IBS is strongly influenced by a psychological tendency to report pain and urge rather than increased neurosensory sensitivity.

  • AML, ascending methods of limits
  • BSI, Brief Symptom Inventory
  • IBS, irritable bowel syndrome
  • IBS-C, constipation predominant irritable bowel syndrome
  • IBS-D, diarrhoea predominant irritable bowel syndrome
  • IOP, individual operating pressure
  • ROC, receiver operator characteristic
  • SDT, sensory decision theory analysis
  • hypersensitivity
  • hypervigilance
  • perceptual response bias
  • irritable bowel syndrome

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Published Online First 3 May 2007

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • Digest
    Robin Spiller Emad El-Omar