Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Letter in response to ‘Unacceptable variation in abdominoperineal excision rates for rectal cancer: time to intervene?’
  1. J Murphy,
  2. D Boyle,
  3. C Bhan,
  4. N S Williams
  1. Centre for Academic Surgery, The Royal London Hospital, London, UK
  1. Mr C Bhan, Centre for Academic Surgery, 3rd Floor Alexandra Wing, The Royal London Hospital, London E1 1BB, UK; c.bhan{at}qmul.ac.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

We read with interest the article by Morris et al (Published Online First: 5 June 2008. doi 10.1136/gut.2007.137877).While these data demonstrate significant variation in abdominoperineal excision (APE) rates across both National Health Service (NHS) trusts and individual surgeons, it should be appreciated that the rates in England overall were comparable with those of specialist centres.1 Furthermore, these data indicate that in 2003 approximately 25.5% of rectal cancer patients underwent APE in England, whereas a similar study from the USA reported a 51.7% incidence of anorectal excision in …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

Linked Articles

  • Letter
    E Morris P Quirke J D Thomas L Fairley B Cottier D Forman