Standard steroid treatment for autoimmune pancreatitis
- T Kamisawa1,
- T Shimosegawa2,
- K Okazaki3,
- T Nishino4,
- H Watanabe5,
- A Kanno2,
- F Okumura6,
- T Nishikawa7,
- K Kobayashi8,
- T Ichiya9,
- H Takatori10,
- K Yamakita11,
- K Kubota12,
- H Hamano13,
- K Okamura14,
- K Hirano15,
- T Ito16,
- S B H Ko17,
- M Omata15
- 1Department of Internal Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
- 2Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
- 3Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
- 4Department of Internal Medicine, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Yachiyo Medical Center, Yachiyo, Japan
- 5Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Oncology, Cancer Research Institute, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan
- 6Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
- 7Division of Gastroenterology and Hematology/Oncology, Asahikawa Medical College, Asahikawa, Japan
- 8Department of Medicine and Molecular Science, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
- 9Center for Gastroenterology, Teine-Keijinkai Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
- 10Department of Gastroenterology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan
- 11Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
- 12Division of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan
- 13Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
- 14Department of Gastroenterology, Sapporo Kosei Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
- 15Department of Gastroenterology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- 16Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
- 17Department of Gastroenterology, Nagoya University, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
- Correspondence to Dr T Kamisawa, Department of Internal Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital, 3-18-22 Honkomagome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8677, Japan; kamisawa{at}cick.jp
- Revised 22 February 2009
- Accepted 17 March 2009
- Published Online First 26 April 2009
Abstract
Objective: To establish an appropriate steroid treatment regimen for autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP).
Methods: A retrospective survey of AIP treatment was conducted in 17 centres in Japan. The main outcome measures were rate of remission and relapse.
Results: Of 563 patients with AIP, 459 (82%) received steroid treatment. The remission rate of steroid-treated AIP was 98%, which was significantly higher than that of patients without steroid treatment (74%, 77/104; p<0.001). Steroid treatment was given for obstructive jaundice (60%), abdominal pain (11%), associated extrapancreatic lesions except the biliary duct (11%), and diffuse enlargement of the pancreas (10%). There was no relationship between the period necessary to achieve remission and the initial dose (30 mg/day vs 40 mg/day) of prednisolone. Maintenance steroid treatment was given in 377 (82%) of 459 steroid-treated patients, and steroid treatment was stopped in 104 patients. The relapse rate of patients with AIP on maintenance treatment was 23% (63/273), which was significantly lower than that of patients who stopped maintenance treatment (34%, 35/104; p = 0.048). From the start of steroid treatment, 56% (55/99) relapsed within 1 year and 92% (91/99) relapsed within 3 years. Of the 89 relapsed patients, 83 (93%) received steroid re-treatment, and steroid re-treatment was effective in 97% of them.
Conclusions: The major indication for steroid treatment in AIP is the presence of symptoms. An initial prednisolone dose of 0.6 mg/kg/day, is recommend, which is then reduced to a maintenance dose over a period of 3–6 months. Maintenance treatment with low-dose steroid reduces but dose not eliminate relapses.
Footnotes
-
Competing interests None.
-
Provenance and Peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
-
See Commentary, p 1438









