Article Text

PDF
Sulforaphane targets pancreatic tumour-initiating cells by NF-κB-induced antiapoptotic signalling
  1. G Kallifatidis1,
  2. V Rausch1,
  3. B Baumann2,
  4. A Apel1,
  5. B M Beckermann1,
  6. A Groth1,
  7. J Mattern1,
  8. Z Li3,
  9. A Kolb3,
  10. G Moldenhauer4,
  11. P Altevogt5,
  12. T Wirth2,
  13. J Werner3,
  14. P Schemmer3,
  15. M W Büchler3,
  16. A V Salnikov4,
  17. I Herr1
  1. 1
    Molecular OncoSurgery Group, University of Heidelberg and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
  2. 2
    Institute of Physiological Chemistry, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
  3. 3
    Department of General Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
  4. 4
    Department of Molecular Immunology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
  5. 5
    Tumour Immunology Program, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
  1. Professor I Herr, Department of General Surgery, University of Heidelberg and DKFZ-G403, Molecular OncoSurgery, Im Neuenheimer Feld 365, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany; i.herr{at}dkfz.de

Abstract

Background and aims: Emerging evidence suggests that highly treatment-resistant tumour-initiating cells (TICs) play a central role in the pathogenesis of pancreatic cancer. Tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is considered to be a novel anticancer agent; however, recent studies have shown that many pancreatic cancer cells are resistant to apoptosis induction by TRAIL due to TRAIL-activated nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) signalling. Several chemopreventive agents are able to inhibit NF-κB, and favourable results have been obtained—for example, for the broccoli compound sulforaphane—in preventing metastasis in clinical studies. The aim of the study was to identify TICs in pancreatic carcinoma for analysis of resistance mechanisms and for definition of sensitising agents.

Methods: TICs were defined by expression patterns of a CD44+/CD24, CD44+/CD24+ or CD44+/CD133+ phenotype and correlation to growth in immunodeficient mice, differentiation grade, clonogenic growth, sphere formation, aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity and therapy resistance.

Results: Mechanistically, specific binding of transcriptionally active cRel-containing NF-κB complexes in TICs was observed. Sulforaphane prevented NF-κB binding, downregulated apoptosis inhibitors and induced apoptosis, together with prevention of clonogenicity. Gemcitabine, the chemopreventive agents resveratrol and wogonin, and the death ligand TRAIL were less effective. In a xenograft model, sulforaphane strongly blocked tumour growth and angiogenesis, while combination with TRAIL had an additive effect without obvious cytotoxicity in normal cells. Freshly isolated patient tumour cells expressing markers for TICs could be sensitised by sulforaphane for TRAIL-induced cytotoxity.

Conclusion: The data provide new insights into resistance mechanisms of TICs and suggest the combination of sulforaphane with TRAIL as a promising strategy for targeting of pancreatic TICs.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • See Commentary, p 900

  • ▸ Additional figures are published online only at http://gut.bmj.com/content/vol58/issue7

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Ethics approval: Patient material was obtained with the approval of the ethical committee of the University of Heidelberg.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles