Article Text

PDF
The provision of a percutaneously placed enteral tube feeding service
  1. David Westaby1,
  2. Alison Young2,
  3. Paul O'Toole2,
  4. Geoff Smith1,
  5. David S Sanders3
  1. 1Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
  2. 2Gastroenterology Department, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, UK
  3. 3Department of Gastroenterology, Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr David Westaby, Department of Gastroenterology Hammersmith Hospital Site, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W12 0HS, UK; david.westaby{at}imperial.nhs.uk

Abstract

There is overwhelming evidence that the maintenance of enteral feeding is beneficial in patients in whom oral access has been diminished or lost. Short-term enteral access is usually achieved via naso-enteral tube placement. For longer term tube feeding there are recognised advantages for enteral feeding tubes placed percutaneously. The provision of a percutaneous enteral tube feeding service should be within the remit of the hospital nutrition support team (NST). This designated team should provide a framework for patient selection, pre-assessment and post-procedural care. Close working relations with community-based services should be established. An accredited therapeutic endoscopist should be a member of the NST and direct the technical aspects of the service. Every endoscopy unit in an acute hospital setting should provide a basic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) service. This should include provision for fitting a PEG jejunal extension (PEGJ) if required. Specialist units should be identified where a more comprehensive service is provided, including direct jejunal placement (DPEJ), as well as radiological and laparoscopically placed tubes. Good understanding of the indications for percutaneous enteral tube feeding will prevent inappropriate procedures and ensure that the correct feeding route is selected at the appropriate time. Each unit should adopt and become familiar with a limited range of PEG tube equipment. Careful adherence to the important technical details of tube insertion will reduce peri-procedural complications. Post-procedural complications remain relatively common, however, and an awareness of the correct approach to managing them is essential for all clinicians involved in providing a percutaneous enteral tube feeding service. Finally, ethical considerations should always be taken into account when considering long-term enteral feeding, especially for patients with a poor quality of life.

  • Enteral nutrition
  • percutaneous gastrostomy
  • PEG tube
  • guideline
  • nutrition

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.