Article Text


PMO-099 A comparative study of laparoscopic vs open distal pancreatectomy
  1. D J Malde,
  2. Y Khaled,
  3. J Packer,
  4. N De Liguori,
  5. R Deshpande,
  6. D O'Reilly,
  7. D Sherlock,
  8. B J Ammori
  1. The HPB Unit, North Manchester General Hospital, Manchester, UK


Introduction The laparoscopic approach to distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant diseases appears to offer advantages and is replacing open surgery in some centres. However, well-designed studies comparing laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) to open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) are limited. We present a single-institution study comparing the outcomes of LDP to ODP.

Methods The demographic details, clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients who underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy were compared to those who had the surgery performed by open technique. The two approaches were compared on an intention-to-treat basis. Data shown represent medians.

Results Between 2002 and 2009, 32 patients (20 female) underwent 16 LDP and 16 ODP respectively. The laparoscopic and open groups were comparable for age (57 vs 63 years, p=0.584), sex distribution and tumour size (3.9 vs 4 cm, p=0.939). Both groups had a comparable number of malignant cases (56% vs 50%, p=1.0). Although LDP took longer to complete (287.5 vs 240 min, p=0.061), it was associated with significantly lower blood loss (300 vs 500 ml, p=0.031) but comparable perioperative transfusion rate (p=0.471). The laparoscopic approach was associated with a significantly higher spleen-preservation rate (overall: 50% vs 12.5%, p=0.05; benign pathology: 85.7% vs 25%, p=1.0). LDP patients had a significantly lower HDU stay (1 vs 4.5 days, p<0.001) and a significantly lower postoperative hospital stay (6.5 vs 13.5 days, p=0.001). There was no significant difference in the postoperative morbidity and the R0 resection margin status.

Conclusion The laparoscopic approach to distal pancreatectomy results in significantly lower blood loss, and shorter HDU and hospital stay compared with open surgery. The postoperative morbidity and R0 resection margin rates were comparably similar.

Competing interests None declared.

Statistics from

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.