Article Text


Pancreatic free papers
OC-113 Prevention of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis: complete systematic review
  1. K Altaf1,
  2. M A Javed1,
  3. D Lythgoe2,
  4. F Wright2,
  5. R Sutton1
  1. 1Department of Molecular and Clincial cancer medicine, Liverpool NIHR Pancreas Biomedical Research Unit, Liverpool, UK
  2. 2Department of Medical statistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK


Introduction Post-ERCP acute pancreatitis (post-ERCP-AP) occurs in ∼5% of patients undergoing ERCP, severe in ∼1%. Despite multiple trials, optimal prophylaxis remains undetermined. We sought to clarify the effectiveness of prophylactic interventions for post-ERCP AP through multiple meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched by two independent reviewers to identify all RCTs that tested treatments to reduce post-ERCP AP. Data were extracted to permit Jadad scoring, grouping of RCTs by therapeutic mechanism and separate meta-analysis of each group. The main outcome measure was post-ERCP AP, defined as amylase elevated to >3× upper limit of normal with >24 h abdominal pain.

Results 71 RCTs of the highest quality (Jadad score 5 for pharmacological and three for interventional trials) were identified. Pancreatic stents (trials (T)—5; patients (P)—377; RR 0.20; 95% CI 0.09 to 0.42) were most effective; significant reductions in post-ERCP AP resulted from secretion inhibitors (T—12; P—4851; RR 0.54; CI 0.36 to 0.83), protease inhibitors (T—9; P—3752; RR 0.54; CI 0.38 to 0.78) and smooth muscle relaxants (T—9; P—2110; RR 0.67; CI 0.52 to 0.87). Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; T—4; P—733; RR 0.68; CI 0.46 to 1.00), interleukin-10 (IL-10; T—3; P—642; RR 0.79; CI 0.55 to 1.14), anti-oxidants (T—5; P—2100; RR 0.90; CI 0.54 to 1.50), anti-coagulants (T—2; P—533; RR 0.85; CI 0.48 to 1.53), non-ionic (vs ionic) contrast agents (T—8; P—3095; RR 1.32; CI 0.92 to 1.88), wire guided cannulation, (T—7; P—2103; RR 0.63; CI 0.34 to 1.17) pre cut papillotomy (T—4; P—558; RR 0.57; CI 0.20 to 1.59) and steroids (T—3; P—924; RR 1.09; CI 0.70 to 1.70) did not reduce post-ERCP AP.

Conclusion This is the most comprehensive systematic review on the subject to date which shows that pancreatic stents, secretion and protease inhibitors and smooth muscle relaxants reduce the risk of post-ERCP AP. Large well-designed RCTs of combination vs single agent prophylaxis are required.

Competing interests None declared.

Statistics from

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.