Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma versus conventional hepatocellular carcinoma: better 5-year survival or artifactual result of research methodology?

Basile Njei

doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306333

Subscribe
Log In More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via BSG

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
Basket
Search More

Search for this keyword

Advanced search

Close More
Main menu

Latest content

Current issue

Archive

Authors

About

Hosted content
Subscribe
Log in More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via BSG

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
BMJ Journals

Citation Tools

Commentary

Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma versus conventional hepatocellular carcinoma: better 5-year survival or artifactual result of research methodology?

Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Cite this article as:: Njei B

Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma versus conventional hepatocellular carcinoma: better 5-year survival or artifactual result of research methodology?

Gut 2014;63:1374-1375.

Log in using your username and password

Main menu

Log in using your username and password

You are here

Download to a citation manager

Read the full text or download the PDF:

Log in using your username and password