Article Text

PDF
Original article
Iron fortification adversely affects the gut microbiome, increases pathogen abundance and induces intestinal inflammation in Kenyan infants
  1. Tanja Jaeggi1,
  2. Guus A M Kortman2,
  3. Diego Moretti1,
  4. Christophe Chassard1,
  5. Penny Holding3,
  6. Alexandra Dostal1,
  7. Jos Boekhorst4,
  8. Harro M Timmerman4,
  9. Dorine W Swinkels2,
  10. Harold Tjalsma2,
  11. Jane Njenga5,
  12. Alice Mwangi5,
  13. Jane Kvalsvig6,
  14. Christophe Lacroix1,
  15. Michael B Zimmermann1
  1. 1Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  2. 2Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  3. 3International Center for Behavioural Studies, Mombasa, Kenya
  4. 4NIZO Food Research B.V., Ede, The Netherlands
  5. 5Department of Food, Technology and Nutrition, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
  6. 6University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
  1. Correspondence to Tanja Jaeggi, Institute of Food, Nutrition and Health, ETH Zentrum, Schmelzberstrasse 7, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland; tanja.jaeggi{at}hest.ethz.ch

Abstract

Background In-home iron fortification for infants in developing countries is recommended for control of anaemia, but low absorption typically results in >80% of the iron passing into the colon. Iron is essential for growth and virulence of many pathogenic enterobacteria. We determined the effect of high and low dose in-home iron fortification on the infant gut microbiome and intestinal inflammation.

Methods We performed two double-blind randomised controlled trials in 6-month-old Kenyan infants (n=115) consuming home-fortified maize porridge daily for 4 months. In the first, infants received a micronutrient powder (MNP) containing 2.5 mg iron as NaFeEDTA or the MNP without iron. In the second, they received a different MNP containing 12.5 mg iron as ferrous fumarate or the MNP without the iron. The primary outcome was gut microbiome composition analysed by 16S pyrosequencing and targeted real-time PCR (qPCR). Secondary outcomes included faecal calprotectin (marker of intestinal inflammation) and incidence of diarrhoea. We analysed the trials separately and combined.

Results At baseline, 63% of the total microbial 16S rRNA could be assigned to Bifidobacteriaceae but there were high prevalences of pathogens, including Salmonella Clostridium difficile, Clostridium perfringens, and pathogenic Escherichia coli. Using pyrosequencing, +FeMNPs increased enterobacteria, particularly Escherichia/Shigella (p=0.048), the enterobacteria/bifidobacteria ratio (p=0.020), and Clostridium (p=0.030). Most of these effects were confirmed using qPCR; for example, +FeMNPs increased pathogenic E. coli strains (p=0.029). +FeMNPs also increased faecal calprotectin (p=0.002). During the trial, 27.3% of infants in +12.5 mgFeMNP required treatment for diarrhoea versus 8.3% in −12.5 mgFeMNP (p=0.092). There were no study-related serious adverse events in either group.

Conclusions In this setting, provision of iron-containing MNPs to weaning infants adversely affects the gut microbiome, increasing pathogen abundance and causing intestinal inflammation.

Trial registration number NCT01111864.

  • Iron Nutrition
  • Enteric Bacterial Microflora
  • Infant Gut
  • Gut Inflammation
  • Enteropathogenic E Coli

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles