Article Text

PDF
PTU-199 A regional assessment of perineal wound complications after abdomino-perineal excision of the rectum
  1. N Sengupta1,
  2. J Tankel1,
  3. I Panagiotopoulou1,
  4. D Pournaras2,
  5. S Pilgrim3,
  6. C Challand2,
  7. N Keeling2,
  8. K Aryal4,
  9. R Lal4,
  10. K Brown5,
  11. M Obichere5,
  12. S Gurjar5,
  13. F Younis5
  14. East of England Surgical Research Collaborative
  1. 1Department of General Surgery, Luton and Dunstable University Hospital Trust, Luton
  2. 2Department of General Surgery, West Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Bury St Edmunds
  3. 3Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester
  4. 4Department of General Surgery, James Paget University Hospital, Great Yarmouth
  5. 5Department of General Surgery, Luton and Dunstable University Hospital, Luton, UK

Abstract

Introduction Perineal wound complications following abdomino-perineal excision of the rectum (APER) are an important cause of morbidity in the treatment of low rectal cancers. Complications result in prolonged hospital stay, hospital readmission and higher medical expenditure. Our primary aim was to describe the short and long-term outcomes of the perineal wound and factors affecting wound healing after APER.

Method We performed a retrospective case note review of consecutive patients who underwent APER between January 2002 and January 2012 in three centres in the East of England. Demographic data and factors affecting perineal wound healing were analysed.

Results 242 patients (155 male, 76 female; median age 70 years) underwent APER. The median time to perineal wound healing was 2 months (range 1–37 months) with a minor perineal complication rate of 23.6% and major perineal complication rate of 22.7%. Perineal wound healing was significantly adversely impacted by use of the lithotomy operative position (p = 0.000), a positive circumferential resection (CRM) margin (p = 0.006), adverse tumour grade (p = 0.003) and lymph node (LN) positivity (p = 0.002). Patient factors (immunosuppression, diabetes mellitus and smoking) or preoperative treatment modalities (neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy) were not statistically significant.

Conclusion Poor perineal wound healing after APER was associated with lithotomy patient positioning, CRM positivity and tumour grade.

Disclosure of interest None Declared.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.