Article Text

PDF
PWE-377 Pitfalls in piecemeal resection of complex colorectal polyps
  1. ZP Tsiamoulos,
  2. T Elliott,
  3. N Suzuki,
  4. P Bassett,
  5. BP Saunders
  1. Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark–s Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK

Abstract

Introduction The role of piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (p-EMR) for sessile/flat colonic polyps previously destined for surgery is expanding. However, surgery remains appropriate in some cases. The objectives of this study were to determine the primary reasons in this decision-making, and factors associated with polyp non-excision, and the presence of submucosal invasive cancer (SMIC).

Method A prospective observational cohort study of all polyps referred for consideration of p-EMR to our tertiary centre between January 2010 and August 2012 was performed. For each case, a detailed endoscopic evaluation of the polyp was performed prior to the polyp being excised or not excised. The primary reason for polyp non-excision was documented. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to determine factors associated with (i) non-excision and (ii) submucosal invasive cancer (SMIC).

Results Seventy-one of 419 (17%) polyps were not excised (p-EMR not attempted in 52/71 and abandoned in 19/71 cases). The primary reasons for non-excision were; suspected SMIC (36/71), polyp size +/- location, poor polyp access and patient comorbidities. On multivariate analysis, factors associated with polyp non-excision were increasing polyp size (p < 0.001), site (caecum and sigmoid colon, p < 0.001), surface features suggestive of SMIC (Paris IIc, Kudo V and NICE III, all p < 0.001) and female gender (p = 0.04). SMIC was present in 9% of polyps >2cm and was more prevalent in the rectum to the descending colon than in the transverse colon to caecum (p = 0.04). Although surface features were associated with SMIC on univariable analysis and the positive predictive values are relatively high (Paris IIc 80%, Kudo V 86% and NICE III 86%)., the sensitivity of these features for a diagnosis of SMIC were relatively low (Paris IIc 11%, Kudo V 49% and NICE III 51%).

Conclusion A percentage of polyps referred to a tertiary institution were not suitable for p-EMR, most commonly because of suspicion of SMIC. Specific surface features of malignancy may be present but the physician’s overall endoscopic evaluation was also useful in predicting suitability of polyps for p-EMR.

Disclosure of interest None Declared.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.