Article Text

PDF
OC-024 Does the Point of Care Test, Simtomax, Distinguish between Coeliac Disease and Non-Coeliac Gluten Sensitivity?
  1. MS Lau,
  2. PD Mooney,
  3. WL White,
  4. M Burden,
  5. SH Wong,
  6. M Kurien,
  7. DS Sanders
  1. Academic Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK

Abstract

Introduction Non coeliac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) is an emerging clinical entity with a prevalence of 0.5–13%. It is characterised by gluten related symptoms with a negative coeliac serology and no villous atrophy (VA). It is currently a diagnosis based on exclusion of coeliac disease (CD). We aimed to assess the role of Simtomax, an IgA/G deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP) based point of care test (POCT), in differentiating between NCGS and CD.

Methods Group 1: we compared the sensitivities of 3 POCTs: Simtomax, Biocard [IgA-tissue transglutaminase (TTG)] and Celiac Quick Test (IgA/G/M-TTG). We prospectively recruited 100 patients referred with a positive endomysial antibody (EMA) attending for a gastroscopy. All patients undertook the 3 POCTs, EMA, TTG, and all underwent a gastroscopy with 5 duodenal biopsies. Sensitivities were measured based on their histology.

Group 2: the sensitivity of Simtomax in the general population was evaluated by prospectively recruiting 667 patients with gastrointestinal symptoms or ataxia attending for a gastroscopy. To reduce positive ascertainment bias, we excluded patients referred with a positive EMA, previous VA, known CD, self-reported gluten sensitivity, and those on a gluten free diet. All patients undertook Simtomax, EMA, TTG and a gastroscopy with 5 duodenal biopsies. Sensitivities were measured based on their histology.

Group 3: we demonstrated the sensitivities of Simtomax in a gluten sensitive population. 35 patients with self-reported gluten sensitivity attending for a gastroscopy were prospectively recruited. All patients undertook Simtomax, EMA, TTG and a gastroscopy with 5 duodenal biopsies. Sensitivities were measured based on their histology.

Results Group 1 showed that Simtomax was the best POCT in detecting CD. The CD prevalence was 85%. In group 2, the sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of Simtomax were comparable to that of EMA and TTG. The prevalence of CD was 4.95%. In group 3, Simtomax had 100% sensitivity and NPV in differentiating between CD and NCGS. 4 patients (11.4%) were diagnosed with CD, 4 (11.4%) with potential CD (positive serology but no VA) and 27 (77.1%) with NCGS (negative serology and no VA).

Abstract OC-024 Table 1

Conclusion Simtomax was the most accurate POCT for detecting CD. In a lower CD prevalence group 2 cohort, its sensitivity remained comparable to TTG and EMA. Simtomax had 100% sensitivity in detecting CD in patients with self-reported gluten sensitivity, and 100% NPV in identifying patients with NCGS.

Disclosure of Interest M. Lau: None Declared, P. Mooney: None Declared, W. White: None Declared, M. Burden: None Declared, S. Wong: None Declared, M. Kurien: None Declared, D. Sanders Grant/research support from: Tillotts Pharma for investigator led studies in coeliac disease. None of the funding sources had any input in the study design, access to study data, interpretation of the findings or drafting of the abstract.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.