Article Text

PDF
PTH-109 Inequality of provision of inflammatory bowel disease nurses (ibd-n) across england: correlation with metrics of unplanned hospital care for adult services
  1. M Shawihdi1,
  2. A Kneebone2,
  3. K Bodger1,2
  1. 1Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool
  2. 2Gastroenterology Dept, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK

Abstract

Introduction Despite better IBD-N provision in the UK, national audit suggests only 48% of patients admitted as an emergency are seen by a specialist nurse.(1) An estimated 1 00 000 people with IBD don’t have access to an IBD-N and 63% of services don’t have enough IBD-N to meet the needs of everyone affected.(2) Duties in elective services may compete with the availability of an IBD-N to support hospitalised patients. Although data is available for basic levels of IBD-N provision, there is no published information relating current levels of staffing to emergency care workload.

Method Data sources: (a) UK IBD Audit: Hospital data for IBD-N provision, expressed as Full Time Equivalents (FTE) reported in organisation audit for Dec 2013 (3); (b) Hospital Episode Statistics for England (2013/14): relating to all cases coded with an IBD-specific code, including their all-cause hospitalizations. Site mapping: Hospital sites participating in audit were mapped manually to organisational site codes available in HES, matching 140 hospitals. Data Analysis: For HES data, algorithms based on admission method, coded diagnoses and procedures were used to categorise admissions, extracting a series of metrics including annual counts and total emergency bed days (EmBedDays) for IBD-related emergency admissions, aggregated at site level.

Results Provision tends to increase with higher burden of unplanned care at site level, but only with modest correlation between IBD-N (FTEs) and IBD-specifc EmBedDays, r=0.47 (p<0.001). This masks a high degree of site variability: Annual IBD-related EmBedDays ranged from 286–1736 for sites with Zero FTE (n=16 hospitals), 243–2295 for sites with 1 FTE (n=38) and 438–2699 for sites with 2 FTE (n=22), equating to between six and nine fold variation in unplanned bed days at a given level of nursing provision. We did not find a correlation between FTE and a simple site-level process measure (e.g. crude 30 day readmission rate; r=−0.11, p=0.21) but further metrics will be evaluated.

Conclusion Provision of IBD-N is not matched to unplanned care workloads for English hospitals. The emergency bed days falling within the potential remit of an individual IBD-N may vary as much as nine fold between different hospital sites.

[Funding: Crohn’s and Colitis UK]

References

  1. . Royal College of Physicians. National clinical audit report of inpatient care for people with ulcerative colitis: adult national report. UK IBD audit. London: RCP, 2014.

  2. . https://www.crohnsandcolitis.org.uk/get-involved/campaigning/more-ibd-nurses-better-care-campaign#sthash.79awqrIJ.dpuf

  3. . Royal College of Physicians. National audit report of inflammatory bowel disease service provision: adult national report. UK IBD audit. London: RCP, 2014.

Disclosure of Interest M. Shawihdi: None Declared, A Kneebone: None Declared, K Bodger Conflict with: AbbVie, Conflict with: Boston Scientific | Takeda

  • Emergency Admission
  • Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • service evaluation
  • specialist nurse

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.