Article Text

Download PDFPDF
The genetic basis of colorectal cancer in a population-based incident cohort with a high rate of familial disease
  1. M O Woods1,
  2. H B Younghusband1,
  3. P S Parfrey2,
  4. S Gallinger3,
  5. J McLaughlin4,
  6. E Dicks2,
  7. S Stuckless2,
  8. A Pollett5,
  9. B Bapat5,
  10. M Mrkonjic5,
  11. A de la Chapelle6,
  12. M Clendenning6,
  13. S N Thibodeau7,
  14. M Simms1,
  15. A Dohey1,
  16. P Williams1,
  17. D Robb8,
  18. C Searle8,
  19. J S Green1,
  20. R C Green1
  1. 1Discipline of Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada
  2. 2Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada
  3. 3Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
  4. 4Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada
  5. 5Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
  6. 6Human Cancer Genetics Program, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA
  7. 7Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
  8. 8Discipline of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada
  1. Correspondence to M O Woods, Discipline of Genetics, Rm4333, Health Sciences Centre, St. John's, NL, A1B 3V6, Canada; mwoods{at}mun.ca

Abstract

Background and aims Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most frequent cancer in developed countries. Newfoundland has the highest incidence of CRC in Canada and the highest rate of familial CRC yet reported in the world. To determine the impact of mutations in known CRC susceptibility genes and the contribution of the known pathways to the development of hereditary CRC, an incident cohort of 750 patients with CRC (708 different families) from the Newfoundland population was studied.

Methods Microsatellite instability (MSI) testing was performed on tumours, together with immunohistochemistry analysis for mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Where indicated, DNA sequencing and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplifications of MMR genes and APC was undertaken. DNA from all patients was screened for MUTYH mutations. The presence of the BRAF variant, p.V600E, and of MLH1 promoter methylation was also tested in tumours.

Results 4.6% of patients fulfilled the Amsterdam criteria (AC), and an additional 44.6% fulfilled the revised Bethesda criteria. MSI-high (MSI-H) was observed in 10.7% (n=78) of 732 tumours. In 3.6% (n=27) of patients, CRC was attributed to 12 different inherited mutations in six known CRC-related genes associated with chromosomal instability or MSI pathways. Seven patients (0.9%) carried a mutation in APC or biallelic mutations in MUTYH. Of 20 patients (2.7%) with mutations in MMR genes, 14 (70%) had one of two MSH2 founder mutations. 17 of 28 (61%) AC families did not have a genetic cause identified, of which 15 kindreds fulfilled the criteria for familial CRC type X (FCCTX).

Conclusions Founder mutations accounted for only 2.1% of cases and this was insufficient to explain the high rate of familial CRC. Many of the families classified as FCCTX may have highly penetrant mutations segregating in a Mendelian-like manner. These families will be important for identifying additional CRC susceptibility loci.

  • DNA mismatch repair
  • colorectal cancer
  • familial adenomatous polyposis
  • mutY homologue
  • microsatellite instability
  • cancer genetics
  • cancer susceptibility
  • cancer syndromes
  • colorectal cancer genes
  • colorectal carcinoma

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Funding Supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research grant CRT-43821; National Cancer Institute of Canada grants 18223 and 18226; Genome Canada (Atlantic Medical Genetics and Genomics Initiative); National Cancer Institute (USA) grant CA16058.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.