Elsevier

Clinica Chimica Acta

Volume 292, Issues 1–2, 25 February 2000, Pages 41-54
Clinica Chimica Acta

Improved assay for fecal calprotectin

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-8981(99)00206-5Get rights and content

Abstract

Fecal calprotectin is a marker of inflammatory and neoplastic disease in the lower gastrointestinal tract. A new fecal sample preparation procedure for the measurement of calprotectin has been developed, with higher calprotectin yield and lower contamination risk. Changes in the new method compared to the original [Røseth AG, Fagerhol MK, Aadland E, Schønsby H. Assessment of the neutrophil dominating protein calprotectin in feces. A methodologic study. Scand J Gastroenterol 1992;27(9):793–798] are smaller sample size, higher dilution of the sample, presence of dissociating agents in the extraction solution and procedure performed in closed disposable tubes. The extraction yield was 78% (41–100%) of total calprotectin, giving an overall five-fold increase compared to the original method. Samples with high calprotectin values were increased to a slightly higher degree, than low calprotectin samples, thus improving the separation between high and low calprotectin levels. Median calprotectin level in healthy subjects was 26 μg/g. Pathological samples with pancolitis showed levels up to 30 000 μg/g. The mean C.V. (coefficient of variation) in blended feces was lower than that of unblended, suggesting uneven distribution of calprotectin. However, no significant difference between spot measurements was found when five samples from each of 47 stools were measured. Thus measurements of calprotectin in fecal samples were accurate and reproducible. No interference with foods or relevant oral pharmaceuticals or nutraceuticals was found.

Introduction

Calprotectin is a 36.5-kD calcium binding protein consisting of three polypeptide chains. In the presence of Ca2+, calprotectin is remarkably resistant towards proteolysis [2], [10], [13], [14], [23]. Calprotectin is abundant in neutrophil granulocytes, monocytes, macrophages and submucosal epithelial cells [5], [8]. In neutrophils the protein may account for up to 60% of the protein in the cytosolic fraction [9]. Calprotectin exerts antimicrobial properties in vitro, both bactericidal and fungicidal [6], [32], [33], [35]. The protein also appears to have a regulatory function in the inflammatory process [34].

Several studies have described the clinical relevance of measuring calprotectin. Elevated concentrations of calprotectin in feces have been measured in patients with colorectal cancer, inflammatory bowel diseases and bacterial infections in the gastrointestinal tract (GI) [19], [28], [29]. The highest levels of calprotectin in plasma has been found in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, cystic fibrosis, Crohn’s disease and acute bacterial infections such as sepsis and meningococcal disease [3], [4], [11], [12], [26], [27], [28], [29].

Røseth et al. developed a method for extraction of calprotectin in feces and quantification by an enzyme linked immunoassay [26]. Several clinical studies suggest a diagnostic value of fecal calprotectin measured with this method [15], [18], [19], [22], [27]. The original method has, however, a low calprotectin yield and a high contamination risk with the procedure based on 5 g feces and homogenization with a mechanical rod mixer in an open tube. A new simplified feces sample preparation method has been developed, based on 50–100 mg feces, sample preparation in closed tubes with disposable equipment and dissociating extraction solution. In the present study the new method is compared with the original fecal calprotectin method.

Section snippets

Stool collection

Fecal samples were from 59 healthy volunteers and 30 patients hospitalized in the medical department at Aker University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. Stool samples from subjects participating in ongoing clinical studies were used in a correlation study. Stools were collected in plastic containers and immediately stored frozen at −20°C.

Sample preparation

The new simplified fecal sample preparation was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (‘PhiCal ELISA New Method’, Nycomed Pharma AS, Oslo, Norway) as

Sample preparation procedure with reduced contamination risk

The new sample preparation was performed in closed tubes, and with disposable equipment (Fig. 1A–C). Bacterial growth on blood agar dishes left open during sample preparation demonstrated very low contamination with the new procedure (Fig. 1A–D) compared to the original procedure (Fig. 1E–G).

Factors affecting the calprotectin extraction yield

The dissociating agent urea in the new extraction solution and the ratio between stool and extraction solution affected the yield of calprotectin (Fig. 2). In the original sample preparation of feces, the

Discussion

There is a medical need for screening tests for infectious, inflammatory as well as neoplastic disease in the lower GI tract [31], [36], [38]. Leukocyte markers such as α1-antitrypsin and lactoferrin have been studied in fecal samples [16], [17], [21] as potential markers of inflammatory activity in the gastrointestinal tract. Measurement of plasma proteins in feces has yielded variable results [30], since many of these proteins are unstable in the fecal matrix. Calprotectin has been shown to

References (38)

  • M. Steinbakk et al.

    Antimicrobial actions of calcium binding leucocyte L1 protein, calprotectin

    Lancet

    (1990)
  • J.W.O. Van-den-Berg et al.

    Faecal haem assay — some practical modifications of the haemoquant assay for haemoglobin in faeces

    Clin. Chem. Acta

    (1987)
  • D.G. Altman

    Practical statistics for medical research

    (1996)
  • H.B. Berntzen et al.

    L1, a major granulocyte protein; isolation of high quantities of its subunits

    Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest.

    (1990)
  • H.B. Berntzen et al.

    The L1 protein as a new indicator of inflammatory activity in patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis

    J. Rheumatol.

    (1991)
  • H.B. Berntzen et al.

    The major leukocyte protein L1 as an indicator of inflammatory joint disease

    Scand. J. Rheumatol.

    (1988)
  • P. Brandtzaeg et al.

    Distribution of a formalin-resistant myelomonocytic antigen (L1) in human tissues. 2. Normal and aberrant occurrence in various epithelia

    Am J. Clin. Pathol.

    (1987)
  • P.A. Clohessy et al.

    The mechanism of calprotectin’s candidastic activity appears to involve zinc chelation

    Biochem. Soc. Transactions

    (1996)
  • D. Courtheyn et al.

    Multi-residue enzyme immunoassays for screening of beta-antagonists in faeces and feeds

    Food Agric. Immunol.

    (1994)
  • I. Dale et al.

    Expression of the epithelial L1 antigen as immunohistochemical marker of squamous cell carcinoma of the lung

    Histopathology

    (1989)
  • I. Dale et al.

    Distribution of a new myelomonocytic antigen (L1) in human peripheral blood leukocytes

    Am. J. Clin. Pathol.

    (1985)
  • I. Dale et al.

    Purification and partial characterization of a highly immunogenic human leucocyte protein, the L1 antigen

    Eur. J. Biochem.

    (1983)
  • J. Delabie et al.

    Differential expression of the calcium-binding proteins MRP8 and MRP14 in granulomatous conditions. An immunohistochemical study

    Clin. Exp. Immunol.

    (1990)
  • O. Dunlop et al.

    Calprotectin in cerebrospinal fluid of the HIV infected: A diagnostic marker of opportunistic central nervous system infection?

    Scand. J. Infect. Dis.

    (1991)
  • M.K. Fagerhol et al.

    Calprotectin (the L1 leukocyte protein)

  • M.K. Fagerhol et al.

    Release and quantitation of a leucocyte derived protein (L1)

    Scand. J. Haematol.

    (1980)
  • J.A. Gilbert et al.

    Fecal marker variability in colorectal cancer: calprotectin versus hemoglobin

    Scand. J. Gastroenterol.

    (1996)
  • R.L. Guerrant et al.

    Measurement of fecal lactoferrin as a marker of fecal leukocytes

    J. Clin. Microbiol.

    (1992)
  • R.L. Guerrant et al.

    Fecal lactoferrin screening assay for inflammatory bacterial diarrhea – Reply

    J. Clin. Microbiol.

    (1996)
  • Cited by (177)

    • Comparison of fecal calprotectin and pancreatic elastase assays based on proficiency testing results

      2022, Clinical Biochemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although there is the potential that lyophilized stool may have a matrix effect in different manufacturers assays, other studies of calprotectin assays show consistent results that demonstrate that certain assays appear to be calibrated higher than others [6,10-12]. Additionally, the extraction buffers may contain detergents and denaturants, which would mitigate the effect of misfolding the protein due to lyophilization [3]. Another potential reason for increased variability in fCAL and fPE results might be that some laboratories may not be as skilled as others in the extraction steps, depending on the sample volume and familiarity with the testing.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text