The doxorubicin-streptozotocin combination for the treatment of advanced well-differentiated pancreatic endocrine carcinoma: a judicious option?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2003.09.035Get rights and content

Abstract

Due to their rarity, only few trials have studied the role of the doxorubicin-streptozotocin (DS) combination in advanced well-differentiated pancreatic endocrine carcinomas (AWDPEC). However, the published results are inconsistent. We reviewed all AWDPEC (5-year period, 45 patients) treated in our institution with the DS combination for: objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival, overall survival (OS) and toxicity. An ORR of 36% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 22–49) was obtained, with 16 partial responses (PR). The mean duration of PR was of 19.7 months. Two and 3-year OS rates were 50.2 and 24.4%, respectively. Toxicities were mainly digestive (grade ⩾3 vomiting, 13%) and haematological (grade ⩾3 neutropenia, 24%). Previous systemic chemotherapy and malignant hepatomegaly were associated with a poorer ORR (P=0.033, P=0.016) and OS (P=0.008, P=0.045). Multivariate analysis demonstrated previous chemotherapy as the only independent predictive-factor for survival (P=0.013). In conclusion, our data confirm the sensitivity of AWDPEC to the DS combination, with an ORR of 36% and a remarkable median response duration of 19.7 months, and suggests that it could be considered as a valid option in first-line therapy.

Introduction

Pancreatic endocrine carcinomas (PECs) are rare malignancies, accounting for less than 2% of all gastrointestinal tract malignant tumours and less than 1% of endocrine tumours [1]. They can be classically divided in 2 groups, based on the potential presence of typical clinical symptoms at disease onset: “functional” and “non-functional” pancreatic tumours, respectively 2, 3, 4. Approximately half of PECs express at least one active hormone, such as insulin, gastrin, glucagon or somatostatin. These are responsible for intermittent and often typical, but non-specific, symptomatology. Non-functional tumours are usually diagnosed at a later stage, based upon symptoms related to the tumour burden itself [4].

Therapeutic management of PEC represents a challenge for the physician. Treatment choice is dictated by pathological differentiation and the stage at diagnosis, as well as by the presence of hormone-related symptoms. Well-differentiated PEC (WDPEC) are usually slow-growing tumours that sometimes allow for therapeutic abstention. However, they can display accelerated progression, requiring a much more aggressive attitude to treatment. In the case of localised WDPEC, surgery remains the only curative treatment. However, in the peculiar situation of multiple gastrinomas as part of the MEN1 syndrome, the debate is still open.

WDPEC are considered relatively chemosensitive neoplasms and in cases of a high tumour burden and/or rapidly progressive metastatic disease, chemotherapy is an appropriate therapeutic option 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. First data concerning chemotherapeutic effectiveness in WDPEC date back to 1968, when Murray-Lyon and colleagues reported a case of insulinoma responding to streptozotocin [9]. Since then, several chemotherapeutic agents, including doxorubicin and dacarbazine (DTIC), have been evaluated as single agent therapy. Both demonstrated interesting effects in advanced WDPEC (AWDPEC), with 20–30% response rates, and a tolerable toxicity profile 6, 8. Later, Moertel and colleagues demonstrated, in a prospective randomised trial comparing doxorubicin-streptozotocin (DS), streptozotocin/5-fluorouracil and chlortozotocin, an objective response rate (ORR) of 69% with a median survival of 26.5 months in the DS arm, results that were significantly superior to those of the other 2 regimens. This association became thereafter a standard therapy for progressive AWDPEC. However, a recent study failed to confirm the outstanding anti-tumour activity of the DS combination [10]. Such discrepant results prompted us to review our institution experience of DS in AWDPEC treatment, with three main aims: (1) ORR, (2) toxicity, (3) prognostic parameters of objective response and survival.

Section snippets

Patients

All patients included in our study had been followed in our institution from January 1995 to December 1999. Presence of histologically-confirmed measurable, but unresectable, AWDPEC was necessary for patient inclusion. Pathological diagnoses were all reviewed by a single pathologist and thereafter classified according to the updated World Health Organisation (WHO 2000) classification. Performance status (PS), as well as haematological and non-haematological (cardiac, renal, hepatic, digestive

Results

Between January 1995 and December 1999, 45 consecutive patients suffering from unresectable AWDPEC were evaluated: 27 men (60%) and 18 women (40%) with a median age of 54 years (ranging from 22 to 75 years). Patient characteristics are summarised in Table 1. Most patients had a PS⩽1.

Forty-two out of 45 patients (93%) had metastatic disease when chemotherapy was started, including 87% with liver metastases, responsible for radiological malignant hepatomegaly in 56% of them. Eleven patients had

Discussion

WDPEC are rare tumours usually considered by most authors to be rather chemosensitive, especially to streptozotocin-based regimens 5, 7, 12. Moertel and colleagues obtained, in the only AWDPEC prospective randomised trial published to date, a remarkable ORR of 69% with median survival of 26 months in 36 patients treated with the AS combination [7]. However, in light of the WHO criteria, this ORR is now considered to be an overestimation. Indeed, clinical regression of malignant hepatomegaly, as

Acknowledgments

We thank Florence Neczyporenko, MD for her critical review of the manuscript, and Chantal Boursier for expert secretarial assistance.

References (30)

  • C.G. Moertel et al.

    Phase II trial of doxorubicin therapy for advanced islet cell carcinoma

    Cancer Treat Rep.

    (1982)
  • C.G. Moertel et al.

    Streptozocin-doxorubicin, streptozocin-fluorouracil or chlorozotocin in the treatment of advanced islet-cell carcinoma

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (1992)
  • P.N. Cheng et al.

    Failure to confirm major objective antitumor activity for streptozocin and doxorubicin in the treatment of patients with advanced islet cell carcinoma

    Cancer

    (1999)
  • E. Baudin et al.

    Screening for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and hormonal production in apparently sporadic neuroendocrine tumors

    J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.

    (1999)
  • L.E. Broder et al.

    Pancreatic islet cell carcinoma. results of therapy with streptozotocin in 52 patients

    Ann. Int. Med.

    (1973)
  • Cited by (110)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text