Table 1

Comparison of microscopy and antigen capture enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of Cryptosporidium parvum in stool (n = 978 samples)

All specimens (n = 978) Initial specimens (n = 795)
Results
 Microscopy +; ELISA +97
 Microscopy +; ELISA −55
 Microscopy −; ELISA +11
 Microscopy −; ELISA −963782
Sensitivity of ELISA v microscopy1-150 9/14  (64%)7/12  (58%)
Sensitivity of both methodsv all true positives1-151
 ELISA10/15 (67%)8/13 (61%)
 Microscopy14/15 (93%)12/13 (92%)
  • 1-150 Values are number of tests positive by ELISA or microscopy/number of microscopically positive tests.

  • 1-151 Values are number of tests positive by ELISA or microscopy/number of “true positive” tests. This includes specimens positive for C parvum by microscopy as well as ELISA positive and microscopically negative specimens from patients with subsequent microscopically positive stool samples.