Table 4

Effect of appendicectomy on Crohn’s disease characteristics (n=335)

Appendicectomy
PhenotypenYes (n=36)No (n=299)OR (95% CI)p Value
*t test was used for means.
†3 cases of pure perianal disease omitted from analysis in view of small numbers.
‡1 case of pure perianal disease was not included in analysis.
Mean (SEM) age at diagnosis (y)35.6 (2.0) 29.6 (0.9)0.02*
Immunosuppression
    No19122 (61.1%)169 (56.5%)
    Yes14414 (38.9%)130 (43.5%)0.83 (0.41–1.68)0.60
Bowel resection
    No13513 (36.1%)122 (40.8%)
    Yes20023 (63.9%)177 (59.2%)1.22 (0.59–2.50)0.59
Distribution
    Ileocolonic128 8 (22.2%)120 (40.1%)1.9 (referent)
    Ileal12318 (50%)105 (35.1%)2.4 (1.0–5.9)0.14
    Colonic81 9 (25.0%) 72 (24.1%)1.9 (0.70–5.2)
    Perianal†3 1 (2.8%) 2 (0.7%)
Duration between appendicectomy and CD (y)‡
    Ileal (mean (SEM))1815.0 (2.8)
    Colonic (mean (SEM))916.6 (4.4)0.94
    Ileocolonic (mean (SEM))816.3 (2.7)
Age at appendicectomy among CD patients (y)‡
    Ileal (mean (SEM))1819.4 (2.4)
    Colonic (mean (SEM))923.2 (3.4)
    Ileocolonic (mean (SEM))816.5 (1.6)0.28