Table 1

Clinical features and endoscopic findings in 3009 patients attending for routine diagnostic gastroscopy stratified by endoscopist type (patients whose examinations were unsuccessful were excluded from the latter analyses)

Medical endoscopist (n=1522)Nurse endoscopist (n=1487)p Value
Results relating to patient age are expressed as means (SD).
*Student’s t test; †χ2 test; ‡Fisher’s exact test.
§Some patients had more than one indication for endoscopy and thus percentages do not total 100%.
¶Includes weight loss, assessment of radiological abnormality, disease follow up, and assessment of diarrhoea.
**Includes cancer, Barrett’s oesophagus, oesophagitis, benign stricturing disease, oesophageal or gastric varices, peptic ulcer disease, and vascular lesions.
†† Includes hiatus hernia, gastric polyps, gastritis, and duodenitis.
Patient age (y)57.4 (17.5)58.8 (16.8)0.02*
Patient sex
    Male679 (45%)721 (49%)0.04†
    Female843 (55%)766 (51%)
Indication for endoscopy§
    Dyspepsia853 (56%)890 (60%)0.04†
    Dysphagia123 (8%)109 (7%)0.48†
    Anaemia225 (15%)239 (16%)0.35†
    Haematemesis/melaena206 (14%)159 (11%)0.02†
    Other¶294 (19%)318 (21%)0.17†
Inpatient status
    Inpatient299 (20%)283 (19%)0.70†
    Outpatient1223 (80%)1204 (81%)
Endoscope intubation
    Successful1505 (99%)1479 (99%)0.12‡
    Failure17 (1%)8 (1%)
Diagnosis
    Significant disease**432 (29%)463 (31%)
    Incidental disease††540 (36%)574 (39%)0.006†
    Normal533 (35%)442 (30%)
Biopsy for pathological assesment
    Yes419 (28%)418 (28%)0.83†
    No1086 (72%)1061 (72%)
Biopsy for rapid urease test
    Yes453 (20%)369 (25%)0.002†
    No1052 (70%)1110 (75%)