Table 3 Risk of oesophageal and gastric cancer by BMI at baseline, BMI at age 20 years and change in BMI in the Netherlands Cohort Study on Diet and Cancer, 1986–1997*
Histological subtypes of the oesophagusAdenocarcinoma in subsites of the stomach
Squamous cell carcinomaAdenocarcinomaCardiaDistant stomachNOS
Cases/person time at risk (years)RR† (95% CI)Cases/person time at risk (years)RR‡ (95% CI)Cases/person time at risk (years)RR‡ (95% CI)Cases/person time at risk (years)RR§ (95% CI)Cases/person time at risk (years)RR†† (95% CI)
BMI at baseline (kg/m2)
<20.09/16202.21 (0.99 to 4.92)3/17251.29 (0.40 to 4.16)2/17250.67 (0.16 to 2.80)12/15971.80 (0.96 to 3.39)6/15970.92 (0.38 to 2.25)
20.0–24.951/243031.0 (Referent)51/254911.0 (Referent)68/254911.0 (Referent)115/240901.0 (Referent)93/240901.0 (Referent)
25.0–29.926/191750.63 (0.39 to 1.02)60/201721.40 (0.95 to 2.04)76/201721.32 (0.94 to 1.85)99/190290.97 (0.73 to 1.30)67/190290.85 (0.61 to 1.19)
⩾30.06/32240.93 (0.38 to 2.26)19/34263.96 (2.27 to 6.88)17/34262.73 (1.56 to 4.79)9/31760.68 (0.34 to 1.35)7/31760.77 (0.35 to 1.68)
p trend¶  =  0.04p trend  =  0.001p trend  =  0.002p trend  =  0.13p trend  =  0.33
Continuous, 1 kg/m2 increments92/483210.90 (0.82 to 0.98)133/508141.14 (1.08 to 1.21)163/508141.10 (1.04 to 1.16)235/478930.99 (0.94 to 1.04)173/478930.98 (0.93 to 1.04)
BMI at age 20 years (kg/m2)#
<20.022/107031.35 (0.70 to 2.62)21/110771.07 (0.59 to 1.94)21/110770.66 (0.39 to 1.14)53/105921.40 (0.91 to 2.15)26/105920.60 (0.37 to 0.99)
20.0–21.416/100751.0 (Referent)24/106511.0 (Referent)40/106511.0 (Referent)40/100151.0 (Referent)49/100151.0 (Referent)
21.5–22.911/98860.72 (0.33 to 1.57)37/102891.61 (0.95 to 2.72)39/102891.02 (0.65 to 1.60)49/98131.24 (0.80 to 1.91)40/98130.92 (0.59 to 1.44)
23.0–24.913/76321.03 (0.48 to 2.21)18/80511.02 (0.55 to 1.90)22/80510.75 (0.44 to 1.28)36/75711.12 (0.69 to 1.80)26/75710.70 (0.42 to 1.18)
⩾25.012/31522.49 (1.15 to 5.40)13/32871.97 (0.99 to 3.94)16/32871.47 (0.81 to 2.70)20/31331.60 (0.91 to 2.83)12/31330.82 (0.42 to 1.60)
p trend  =  0.58p trend  =  0.17p trend  =  0.17p trend  =  0.93p trend  =  0.72
Continuous, 1 kg/m2 increments74/414491.07 (0.96 to 1.20)113/433561.04 (0.95 to 1.14)138/433561.07 (1.00 to 1.15)198/411231.01 (0.95 to 1.07)153/411231.01 (0.96 to 1.08)
Change in BMI after 20 years of age (kg/m2)#
<018/41192.57 (1.40 to 4.72)8/43080.75 (0.34 to 1.64)10/43080.68 (0.34 to 1.35)17/40970.77 (0.44 to 1.36)16/40970.85 (0.47 to 1.55)
0–3.932/201341.0** (Referent )51/211081.0** (Referent)70/211081.0** (Referent)106/200361.0** (Referent)82/200361.0** (Referent)
4.0–7.916/135290.73 (0.39 to 1.36)37/141521.34 (0.86 to 2.08)45/141521.22 (0.82 to 1.82)61/133500.85 (0.60 to 1.21)45/133500.85 (0.56 to 1.27)
⩾8.08/36661.39 (0.62 to 3.15)17/37873.41 (1.88 to 6.18)13/37872.07 (1.08 to 3.97)14/36400.86 (0.46 to 1.59)10/36400.86 (0.41 to 1.80)
p trend  =  0.10p trend  =  0.001p trend  =  0.02p trend  =  0.77p trend  =  0.70
Continuous, 1 kg/m2 increments74/414490.90 (0.81 to 1.00)113/433561.14 (1.06 to 1.23)138/433561.07 (1.00 to 1.14)198/411230.98 (0.93 to 1.04)153/411230.99 (0.93 to 1.05)
  • *RR, rate ratio; CI, confidence interval; NOS, adenocarcinoma of the stomach, not otherwise specified; BMI, body mass index (kg/m2). The first year of follow-up was excluded from the analyses. Case-cohort analyses were used which mean that the cases were identified from the entire cohort, while the person years were based only on the subcohort.

  • †Rate ratios adjusted for age; sex; current smoking (yes/no); number of cigarettes/day; and number of years of smoking.

  • ‡Rate ratios adjusted for age and sex.

  • §Rate ratio adjusted for age; sex; current smoking (yes/no); number of cigarettes/day; number of years of smoking; and highest level of education (primary school, lower vocational school, high school and higher vocational/university).

  • ††Rate ratio adjusted for age; sex; current smoking (yes/no); number of cigarettes/day; number of years of smoking; highest level of education (primary school, lower vocational school, high school and higher vocational/university); and a history of gastric ulcer or bleeding (yes/no).

  • ¶Tests for dose-respond trends were assessed by fitting ordinal variables as continuous terms in the Cox proportional hazard model. p Trends were calculated for all categories of a variable. The reported p values are two sided.

  • #Only cases and subcohort members with complete data on BMI at age 20 years were included.

  • **Rate ratios also adjusted for BMI at age 20 years.