Table 3

Characteristics of randomised controlled trials of pharmacological therapies versus placebo in chronic idiopathic constipation

StudyCountry, and number of centresSettingCriteria used to define chronic idiopathic constipationCriteria used to define responseNumber of patients (% female)Drug and dose usedDuration of therapyMethodology
Miner 199932Not statedNot statedModified Rome II criteria*≥3 CSBMs per week229 (not stated)Prucalopride 0.5 mg, 1 mg, 2 mg, or 4 mg od4 weeksRandomisation and concealment of allocation unclear, double-blind
Emmanuel 200233UK, 1 siteTertiary care≤2 spontaneous bowel movements per week or straining on at least 25% of occasions, and negative investigationsTherapeutic effect rated as moderate or above by investigator77 (100)Prucalopride 1 mg od4 weeksRandomisation and concealment of allocation unclear, double-blind
Coremans 200334Belgium, 1 siteTertiary careModified Rome II criteria and negative investigations≥3 stools per week, straining, hard stools, or tenesmus <25% of time53 (98.1)Prucalopride 4 mg od4 weeksRandomisation and concealment of allocation unclear, double-blind
Camilleri 200835USA, 38 sitesSecondary and tertiary careModified Rome II criteria≥3 CSBMs per week620 (87.9)Prucalopride 2 mg or 4 mg od12 weeksRandomisation and concealment of allocation stated, double-blind
Quigley 200936USA, 41 sitesSecondary and tertiary careModified Rome II criteria≥3 CSBMs per week641 (86.6)Prucalopride 2 mg or 4 mg od12 weeksRandomisation and concealment of allocation stated, double-blind
Tack 200937Multinational, number of sites not statedSecondary and tertiary careModified Rome II criteria≥3 CSBMs per week716 (90.8)Prucalopride 2 mg or 4 mg od12 weeksRandomisation and concealment of allocation unclear, double-blind
Muller-Lissner 201038Multinational, 48 sitesSecondary and tertiary careModified Rome II criteria≥3 CSBMs per week303 (70.0)Prucalopride 1 mg, 2 mg, or 4 mg od4 weeksRandomisation and concealment of allocation stated, double-blind
Johanson 200740USA, 8 sitesSecondary and tertiary careModified Rome II criteria and negative investigationsIncrease ≥3 SBMs per week relative to baseline129 (90.6)Lubiprostone 24 μg od, bid, or tid3 weeksRandomisation and concealment of allocation unclear, double-blind
Johanson 200841USA, 20 sitesSecondary and tertiary careModified Rome II criteria and negative investigations≥3 SBMS per week244 (89.7)Lubiprostone 24 μg bid4 weeksRandomisation and concealment of allocation stated, double-blind
Barish 201039Not stated, 20 sitesSecondary and tertiary careModified Rome II criteria and negative investigations≥4 SBMs per week237 (88.2)Lubiprostone 24 μg bid4 weeksRandomisation unclear, concealment of allocation stated, double-blind
Lembo 2010a42USA, 57 sitesSecondary and tertiary careModified Rome II criteria with negative colonoscopy within last 10 years≥3 CSBMs per week and an increase ≥1 relative to baseline for 75% of treatment weeks310 (92.0)Linaclotide 75 μg, 150 μg, 300 μg, or 600 μg od4 weeksRandomisation and concealment of allocation stated, double-blind
Lembo 2010b43USA and Canada, 108 sitesSecondary and tertiary careModified Rome II criteria≥3 CSBMs per week and an increase ≥1 relative to baseline for 75% of treatment weeks630 (89.0)Linaclotide 133 μg or 266 μg od12 weeksRandomisation and concealment of allocation stated, double-blind
Lembo 2010c43USA, 105 sitesSecondary and tertiary careModified Rome II criteria≥3 CSBMs per week and an increase ≥1 relative to baseline for 75% of treatment weeks642 (89.0)Linaclotide 133 μg or 266 μg od12 weeksRandomisation and concealment of allocation stated, double-blind
  • * Modified Rome II criteria; ≤2 spontaneous bowel movements per week, with hard stools, sensation of incomplete evacuation, and straining on at least 25% of bowel movements.

  • Full information not reported in published article, but obtained after correspondence with the authors.

  • bid, twice daily; CSBM, complete spontaneous bowel movement; od, once daily; SBM, spontaneous bowel movement; tid, thrice daily.