Skip to main content
Log in

Inter and intea-observer variation in ultrasonographic detection of gallstones: The Multicenter Italian Study on Epidemiology of Cholelithiasis (M.I.COL.)

  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inter and intea-observer agreement in classifying the presence of gallstones by ultrasonographic images according to established criteria was studied. A film recording of 50 routine ultrasonographic examinations of the gallbladder was read by each of the 46 observers who participated in the Multicenter Italian Study on Epidemiology of Cholelithiasis (M.I.COL.). The overall Kappa score for inter-observer agreement was 0.649, while intea-observer agreement was “good” or “excellent” (Kappa scores >0.60) in 75% of the observers. No statistical difference for inter-observer agreement between “novices” and “expert” echographers was found in the overall Kappa statistic or in category-specific Kappa scores (gallstone, no gallstone, doubtful and inconclusive examinations) The present study suggests that the development of explicit criteria by a group of trained echographers does not eliminate inter-and intea-observer disagreement in categorizing subjects for gallbladder stones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. AchesonR.M. (1960): Observer error and variation in the interpretation of electrocardiograms in an epedemiological study of coronary heart disease. -Br. J. Prev. Soc. Med., 14: 99–122.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allen-MershT.G., MotsonR.W., HatelyW. (1985): Does it matter who does ultrasound examination of the gallbladder? - Br. Med. J., 291: 389–390.

    Google Scholar 

  3. BarbaraL., SamaC., Morselli LabateA., et al. (1987): A population study on the prevalence of gallstone disease: the Sirmione study. - Hepatology, 7: 913–917.

    Google Scholar 

  4. BirnholzJ.C. (1982): Population survey: ultrasonic cholecistography. - Gastrointest. Radiol. 7: 165–167.

    Google Scholar 

  5. ConnH.O., SmithH.W., BrodoG.G.H.M. (1965): Observer variation in the endoscopic diagnosis of esophageal varices: a prospective investigation of the diagnostic validity of esophagoscopy. - N. Engl. J. Med. 272: 830–834.

    Google Scholar 

  6. CooperbergP.L., BurhenneH.J. (1980): Realtime ultrasonography: diagnostic technique of choice in calculous gallbladder disease. - N. Engl. J. Med. 302: 1277–1279.

    Google Scholar 

  7. CradeM., TaylorK.J., RosenfreldA.T.et al. (1978): Surgical and pathological correlation of cholecystosonography and cholecistography. - Am. J. Roentg. 131: 227–229.

    Google Scholar 

  8. FerrucciJ.T., FondtracinJ.S., CooperbergP.L., WeismanH.S. (1981): The radiologic diagnosis of gallbladder disease: an imaging symposium.- Radiology 141: 149–156.

    Google Scholar 

  9. FleissJ.L. (1981): Statistical methods for rates and proportions, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  10. GeffenH., DarnboroughA., DeDombalF.T.et al. (1968): Radiological signs of ulcerative colitis: assessment of their reliability by means of observer variation study. - Gut 9: 150–158.

    Google Scholar 

  11. GiørupT., BrahmM., FoghJ.et al. (1986): Interobserver variation in the detection of metastases on liver scans. - Gastroenterology 90: 166–172.

    Google Scholar 

  12. GoodL.I., EdellS.L., SolowayR.D.et al. (1979): Ultrasonic properties of gallstones. Effect of stone size and composition. - Gastroenterology, 77: 258–263.

    Google Scholar 

  13. KoranL.M. (1975): The reliability of clinical methods, data and judgments. - N. Engl. J. Med. 293: 642–646 (1st part); 695–701 (2nd part).

    Google Scholar 

  14. IngefingerF.J. (1968): Digestive disease as a national problem. - V. Gallstones. Gastroenterology, 55: 102–104.

    Google Scholar 

  15. LandisJ.R., KochG.G. (1977): The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. -Biometrics, 33: 159–174.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lee HessM., CunninghamJ.J. (1984): Effect of examination time of day on the quality of real-time cholesonograms. - Am. J. Roentg 143: 251–253.

    Google Scholar 

  17. McIntoshD.M.F., PenneyH.F. (1980): Gray-scale ultrasonography as a screening procedure in the detection of gallbladder disease. - Radiology 136: 725–727.

    Google Scholar 

  18. NishiyamaH., LewisJ.T., AshareA.B., SaengerE.L. (1975): Interpretation of radionuclide liver images: do training and experience make a difference? - J. Nucl. Med., 16: 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  19. RabinowitzJ.G., YehH.C., CohenB.A. (1983): Gallstone update: radiology. - Semin Liver Dis. 3: 120–131.

    Google Scholar 

  20. RafteryE.B., HollandW.W. (1967): Examination of the heart: and investigation into variation. - Am. J. Epidemiol., 85: 438–444.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rome Group for the epidemiology and prevention of cholelitiasis (GREPCO) (1984): Prevalence of gallstone disease in an italian adult female population. - Am. J. Epidemiol. 118: 796–805.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Additional information

M.I.COL. (Multicentrica Italiana Colelitiasi).

Corresponding author.

See appendix.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Festi, D., Lalloni, L., Taroni, F. et al. Inter and intea-observer variation in ultrasonographic detection of gallstones: The Multicenter Italian Study on Epidemiology of Cholelithiasis (M.I.COL.). Eur J Epidemiol 5, 51–57 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00145045

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00145045

Key words

Navigation