Skip to main content
Log in

Psychometric properties of a specific quality of life questionnaire in angina pectoris patients

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes the psychometric properties of the French version of the APQLQ (Angina Pectoris Quality of Life Questionnaire), that is to say, scaling assumptions, reliability and validity. This disease-specific Swedish questionnaire provides a global score as well as four subscores measuring physical activities, somatic symptoms, emotional distress, and life satisfaction. The French version was produced according to the forward-backward translation methodology. In a cross-sectional study, 183 coronary patients filled out the APQLQ and the MOS (Medical Outcomes Study) SF-36; 170 sent it back; the rate of missing data was low (1.3%). The factorial structure and the high level of inter-scale correlations (> 0.60) suggested that the APQLQ measured one global concept rather than separate domains. The multitrait analysis identified one problematic item correlated strongly with all domains. The internal consistency was good (α Cronbach > 0.70). The correlations with the SF-36 scales were consistent with what was expected. The distribution of the scores of the APQLQ according to the clinical severity of Angina Pectoris (AP) was as hypothesized: the more severe the AP, the more impaired the Quality of Life. The score significantly discriminated between symptomatic (n=110) and asymptomatic patients (n=60) except for the emotional distress scale (p=0.14). We recommend to analyze the French APQLQ as an index rather than as a profile. Its reliability, concurrent and clinical validity allowed its use in clinical trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Spilker B.Quality of Life Assessments in Clinical Trials. New York: Raven Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Erickson P, Scott J. The On-Line Guide to Quality-of-Life Assessment (OLGA): Resource for selecting quality of life assessments. In: Walker S, Rosser RM, eds.Quality of Life Assessment: Key issues in the 1990s 1993;13: 221–232.

  3. Patrick DL, Deyo RA. Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life.Med Care 1989;27(3): S217-S232 (suppl).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bulpitt CJ, Fletcher AE. Measurement of the quality of life in angina.J Hypertens 1987;5(1): S41-S45.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Taylor SH. Drug therapy and quality of life in angina pectoris.Am Heart J 1987;114: 234–20.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fletcher A, McLoone P, Bulpitt CJ. Quality of life in angina pectoris: a randomized controlled trial of transdermal glyceryl trinitrate against placebo.Lancet 1988;2(8601): 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nissinen A, Wiklund I, Lathi I, et al. Anti-anginal therapy and quality of life. A comparison of the effects of transdermal nitroglycerin and long-acting oral nitrates.J Clin Epidemiol 1991;44(9): 989–97.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wiklund I, Comerford MB, Dimenäs E. The relationship between exercise tolerance and quality of life in angina pectoris.Clin Cardiol 1991;14: 204–208.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wilson A, Wiklund I, Lahti T, Wahl M. A summary index for the assessment of quality of life in angina pectoris.J Clin Epidemiol 1991;44: 981–988.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ware JE, Sherbourne CA. The MOS 36-item Short-Form health survey (SF-36). Conceptual framework and item selectionMed Care 1992;30: 473–483.

    Google Scholar 

  11. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form health status survey (SF-36) II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs.Med Care 1993;31(3): 247–23.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stewart AL, Greenfield S, Hays RD et al. Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. Results from the Medical Outcome Study.JAMA 1989;262: 907–913.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Aaronson NK, Acquadro C, Alonso J et al. International Quality Of Life Assessment (IQOLA) project.Qual Life Res 1992;1: 349–351.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Leplège A, Mesbah M, Marquis P. Analyse préliminaire des propriétés psychométriques de la version française d'un questionnaire international de mesure de qualité de vie: le MOS SF-36 (version 1.1).Rev Epidém et Santé Publ 1995;43: 371–379.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Alonso J. Dealing with cross-cultural differences when measuring health status.QOL Newsletter 1992;4: 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hays R, Hayashi T, Sarson S, Ware J Jr. User's guide for the Multitrait Analysis Programme (MAP).RAND Note N-2786-RC-1988.

  17. Nunnally JC.Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Selzer A, Cohn K. Functional classification of cardiac disease: a critique.Am J Cardiol 1972;30: 306.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bullinger M. Indices versus profiles—advantages and disadvantages. In: Walker S, Rosser RM.Quality of Life Assessment: Key issues in the 1990s 1993;12: 209–220.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marquis, P., Fayol, C., Joire, J.E. et al. Psychometric properties of a specific quality of life questionnaire in angina pectoris patients. Qual Life Res 4, 540–546 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00634749

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00634749

Key words

Navigation